• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    374 days ago

    Communities made around hating a specific thing are always awful.

    Except FuckCars because that’s really just pro-urbanism.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      304 days ago

      Except FuckCars

      Unfortunately, the community is still populated and run by some Grade A types.

      Like, the sentiment is good, but you still end up with people who have no communication skills piling in.

      • @Anticorp
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Me: cars are pretty mandatory in cities like L.A. and rural areas

        FuckCars: you’re literally worse than Hitler

      • @grue
        link
        English
        93 days ago

        Hey, I’m trying my best!

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        Has it? Back when I was on Reddit (before the API debacle) it was one of my absolute favourites.

      • @Anticorp
        link
        English
        212 hours ago

        But they’re incredibly aggressive, so the current name fits them better

      • @BradleyUffner
        link
        English
        204 days ago

        They have no interest in appearing less aggressive. Getting to be aggressive is like the highlight of their day.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 days ago

        The name isn’t “no cars” or “never cars”. There are some rare use cases for personal automobiles. But the ways cars operate in our society today? Fuck 'em.

        • Blaze (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          104 days ago

          US society (IIRC you’re a US citizen) definitely is car centric. The issue people have with FuckCars is how it puts the responsibility of the situation to the cars (and their owners) rather than the policies leading to that situation.

          [email protected] could maybe a less “fuck them” alternative

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            124 days ago

            But [email protected] isn’t just about public transport. It’s also about cycling. And walking. And building cities such that walking or cycling are actually viable, not just because there are good bike paths/footpaths, but also because paths are well-shaded, roads are narrow and easy to cross, and the distances you have to travel are lower because density is higher and localities are mixed-use with local businesses. It’s about all the ways that motonormativity is shit.