• @Anticorp
      link
      English
      212 hours ago

      But they’re incredibly aggressive, so the current name fits them better

    • @BradleyUffner
      link
      English
      204 days ago

      They have no interest in appearing less aggressive. Getting to be aggressive is like the highlight of their day.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 days ago

      The name isn’t “no cars” or “never cars”. There are some rare use cases for personal automobiles. But the ways cars operate in our society today? Fuck 'em.

      • Blaze (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        104 days ago

        US society (IIRC you’re a US citizen) definitely is car centric. The issue people have with FuckCars is how it puts the responsibility of the situation to the cars (and their owners) rather than the policies leading to that situation.

        [email protected] could maybe a less “fuck them” alternative

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          123 days ago

          But [email protected] isn’t just about public transport. It’s also about cycling. And walking. And building cities such that walking or cycling are actually viable, not just because there are good bike paths/footpaths, but also because paths are well-shaded, roads are narrow and easy to cross, and the distances you have to travel are lower because density is higher and localities are mixed-use with local businesses. It’s about all the ways that motonormativity is shit.