• NSRXN
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -14 days ago

    “Oh well, people died before laws were introduced, may as well go on a killing spree”

    this is a strawman. my argument is more like “you may object to killing animals for food, but your method is not an effective way to stop it”

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Which is an incredibly stupid point, because it presupposes that reducing needless deaths only has value if absolutely every single death is prevented. This, of course, is completely illogical - even one death that was prevented has value.

      But we don’t care about silly things like “logic” here, right?

      Not to mention that your original point was that you bear no responsibility for the deaths of animals you consume, but who cares as long as you can keep giving stupid arguments ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • NSRXN
        link
        fedilink
        English
        04 days ago

        your original point was that you bear no responsibility for the deaths of animals you consume

        right. and this speaks directly to that.

        • @FooBarrington
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          What the fuck are you talking about? Your response has nothing to do with my point. Complete non-sequitur.

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -14 days ago

            isn’t your point that you think by abstaining from consuming meat, meat production will be impacted? the production grows incessantly. it’s obvious that meat producers do not care whether you buy meat.

            • @FooBarrington
              link
              English
              14 days ago

              I really, really hope you’re a bad faith troll, because otherwise I’m scared for you. A person with your level of intelligence can’t survive on their own. Do you have anyone taking care of you?