Summary

Fox News’s attempt to find support for Donald Trump in Greenland backfired, as most residents expressed disinterest in his proposals.

While one Trump supporter was found, the majority of Greenlanders interviewed criticized Trump’s comments and expressed a preference for remaining under Danish rule.

Despite these setbacks, Trump continues to advocate for acquiring Greenland, citing economic security concerns.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    195 hours ago

    I think there’s value in demonstrating to the non-voter population what the consequences are. For the sake of education. Also, doing this does not preclude doing other things. I wrote this message, and then I’m going to go do some lobbying. There’s a few hours in a day

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -44 hours ago

      I’m more addressing the attitude. Voter blaming is self-defeating, imo. I know that kind words usually read as sarcasm over the internet, but I mean it, good on you for getting out there and lobbying, I love to see it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 hours ago

          I love it even more. Local advocacy isn’t given half the respect it deserves; it’s far more powerful and effective than folks think. I’m doing a lot of local advocacy too, it definitely feels a lot less like shouting into a void.

      • Optional
        link
        12 hours ago

        Voter blaming is self-defeating

        Non voters are self-defeating. that’s the fucking point. If someone voted, then they did what they could!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -32 hours ago

          No. There’s all kinds of people that don’t vote because they’ve accurately assessed that the system resists changing to reflect their needs. People don’t believe in the message of the parties or the government anymore. That’s why we’re in this mess in the first place. Imo, the problem is that the DNC is leaving voters on the table by not giving people something to show up for. Not being Trump isn’t enough. You might think it’s enough, but for at least five million people-- and realistically much more than that-- this last election, it wasn’t. The Democratic party needs to get its shit together, stop blaming voters, stop feeling entitled to people’s votes just because they’re not the other guy, and get out there and really start swinging for the fences. No more insurance regulations, promise universal healthcare; no more homebuyers credits, promise to plunk down commie blocks until homelessness is ended; no more highly conditional student loan debt forgiveness, fuck that whole system up with a hammer so that nobody needs to go into five-or-more digit debt to get a job. Don’t give me excuses or reasons, I’m not interested, Trump is trying to buy/invade Greenland, I don’t give a single fuck about what the legislative horoscopes say, let’s get out there and do it.

          • @btaf45
            link
            118 minutes ago

            . There’s all kinds of people that don’t vote because they’ve accurately assessed that the system resists changing to reflect their needs.

            That makes no sense. The system can only “reflect their needs” as a result of voting. By not voting you are setting yourself up to being a lifetime loser in political affairs. In the long term the system will always reflect what the majority of the VOTERS want, and not necessarily what he majority of the CITIZENS want. If Dems were routinely getting large victories, then politicians would be routinely competing against each other to demonstrate who is going the farthest and the fastest in achieving progress.

          • Optional
            link
            131 minutes ago

            No. There’s all kinds of people that don’t vote because they’ve accurately assessed that the system resists changing to reflect their needs.

            They’ve inaccurately assessed it because not voting is the one thing they can do that will help exactly zero people.

            Imo, the problem is that the DNC is leaving voters on the table by not giving people something to show up for.

            The DNC is famous for listening to idiots. It’s a fair point. but “not giving people something to show up for” is also wrong. See [everything that’s going to happen for four loooooooong goddamn years] for more information.

            Every racist policy, every fascist federal judicial appointment, every foreign policy nightmare, every economic disaster, dog-forbid another global fucking pandemic - ALL would have been avoided.

            So they didn’t show up to prevent that, and since that’s not enough for them - fuck them. They can fucking eat shit. Because the people who did show up to vote for a demented rapist will be shoving shit down on us the whole time.

            Fools.

    • @distantsounds
      link
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      This offers no value other than catharsis, which is totally fine and acceptable, but non-voters aren’t hanging out in the comment sections of political forums.

      • @Seleni
        link
        54 hours ago

        I dunno, I saw lots of people in the comment sections leading up to the election that were quite vocal about not voting/voting 3rd party.

        • @distantsounds
          link
          English
          -33 hours ago

          That might be because the DNC campaign brought on Liz Cheney and said nothing will fundamentally change. Those people you are referring to were voters, disenfranchised voters who could have maybe swayed, but now we are a the cope stage

          • @btaf45
            link
            1
            edit-2
            7 minutes ago

            the DNC campaign brought on Liz Cheney and said nothing will fundamentally change.

            (1) It was the Harris campaign, not “the DNC”. Why would Harris give a shit what “the DNC” thinks about anything? Harris was giving money to the DNC, NOT the other way around. You know that the DNC is not a person right?

            (2) There were many proposed significant changes. A $3000 per child tax credit isn’t a huge thing? The billionaire owned media didn’t want you to learn about them so that Trump would give them gigantic GOP tax cuts. So the media buried it. You could and should have made the effort to learn what they were but you didn’t. You could have read her 82 page PDF of policy proposals.

            (3) As long Harris didn’t change any of her positions to get Liz Cheney’s endorsement, why would she NOT want a free endorsement from a Republican? Especially since everyone knew that Cheney only endorsed Harris to highlight that Traitorapist Trump committed treason against our country.

          • @Seleni
            link
            23 hours ago

            Doesn’t change the fact that they were non-voters in the comment section.

            Change isn’t always good. Yes, I too want change for the better, but voting in change for the worst, even by not voting, is still abysmally stupid no matter the reason.

            • @distantsounds
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Welcome to US politics where your choices are abysmally stupid or worse…which might be the reason people are looking for another party to call home or just give up entirely

        • @distantsounds
          link
          English
          03 hours ago

          Well, did MrL sway your political leanings for the last election here today?

              • @Madison420
                link
                22 hours ago

                That’s complex.

                A. They work for eru and eru tries not to get too involved at that point.

                B. Mordor has air defenses

                C. The kings of men (ringwraith) actively hunt eagles and most of erus minions for that matter.

                D. They show up when saurons eye is turned away and troops notably the kings of men moved away from the main gate.

                E. The big one, it would have been a boring book.