Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new “king”

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it’s an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

  • @nyctre
    link
    51 month ago

    When you’re praising republicans as being the party of the little guy, that’s more than agreeing with 1% of the stuff that they’re doing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -31 month ago

      Same discussion as per the other thread. We clearly disagree on what is the scope of that “praise”. As such, we will never agree.

      • @nyctre
        link
        11 month ago

        Ok, maybe he wasn’t praising republicans as a whole, but he did praise trump for picking a big tech lobbyist in a job in which he claims to want the opposite. “Great pick!” is a praise, you can’t deny that, can you?

        “Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote.”

        That’s their official account complaining about the guy’s daughters being lobbyists, not even him directly. Why is the appointment of Gail Slater, who worked the internet association (big tech lobbyists) and fox corporation, a great pick?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -11 month ago

          Yes, he did praise the specific pick. You are calling her a big tech lobbyist but -from what I understood- he praised picking her because she previously was involved in antitrust cases against VISA, google and Apple.

          I don’t know nearly enough about her to debate her history or actions, just repeating what I read.

          • @nyctre
            link
            11 month ago

            Well, I guess we’ll see. Maybe she’ll do good as he claims