• BigLime
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 month ago

    I’m fr curious if this can work. If it does, it seems beyond impossible to find a 25 year old college woman who would even want to marry

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago

      Two 18 year old students about to start university get married. I think it can even be same sex, marriage is marriage.

      Remember Marriage isn’t for life! You and your partner could get married with the understanding this is just a college marriage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        “Hey, let’s just get married to be eligible for benefits. Yeah, we’ll just pinky promise that we won’t ever abuse the hell out of our ‘partner’ who we now share every single responsibility with. I also took out a huge loan to buy a boat, why are you asking, dear? Half of it is technically yours, why aren’t you happy?”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 month ago

          two penniless students are judgement proof, so even in this scenario when they divorced there wouldn’t be anything to recover. As a 18 year old with nothing, as long as you don’t have kids, there is almost nothing to lose.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        That’s a whole abuse of the purpose of marriage, though

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          A loop hole that is technically correct is still correct.

          What is the purpose of marriage?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            Legally it is a shortcut to establishment of a number of implied contracts, tells the courts how to unwind those contracts, and rights. In some cases the implied contracts are more effective than written ones. Medical decisions and visitation rights being first ones I can think of.

            I sm not a lawyer.

          • Flax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -51 month ago

            Two people bound together for life for the purposes of creating a family

            • @Ledivin
              link
              31 month ago

              Yeah, you can miss me with the religious bullshit. This is a legal loophole in a legal system.

              • Flax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 month ago

                If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman”

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 month ago

                  Then what is your basis for it only being between two people? You’re defining it just like religion does because that’s where you got the idea even if you don’t realize it.

                  • Flax
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -11 month ago

                    Because that’s what marriage is and always has been, anything else is contrary to human nature

              • Flax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -51 month ago

                Only as a last resort. You shouldn’t get married without intending to stay together for life.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              “You shouldn’t use marriage to stop yourself being legally chained to your parents. The purpose of marriage is to legally chain you to your spouse.”

              If people could “divorce” their parents you wouldn’t have to worry about this.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 month ago

              Only two? That seems needlessly restrictive. Is it for religious reasons? Church and state should be separated.

              • Flax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman”

                Also, if it’s more than two, that’s not a marriage; that’s a group chat.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You’re thinking about this all wrong. The age of marriage and childbearing have been going up. Think of the kids who would just decide fuck it might as well just stay married and do this. This could be the arranged marriage of the future.