I believe in Fediverse Supremacy!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    614 hours ago

    Just out of curiosity, what’s your solution?

    (Putting aside that what you describe is still far more room for ban evasion than non-fediverse platforms.)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        513 hours ago

        That wouldn’t work that well, especially when you take law into regard. For example, the european Digital Services Act regulates platforms and platforms have to respond to obligations, sometimes deleting content. Communities are not platforms, instances are. Ergo, you need instance admins be able to comply and respond to the DSA.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          011 hours ago

          The server owners would take care of the content hosted on their server and would need to filter it based on their local laws (to remove CSAM for example, just like current admins need to do), but otherwise this type of decentralization would make the website pretty much a neutral zone that operates outside of specific laws since the people hosting the content (and its backups) could be located all over the world.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39 hours ago

            How’s that different from now?
            Or do you want users to not be banned instancewide for breaking instance rules? Or do you want to abolish instance/server rules aside from local laws altogether?