Year of the Linux Desktop Fediverse!

Side note, DAE find calling them “normies” kinda icky? It’s like straight outta 4chan

  • @cm0002OP
    link
    6212 hours ago

    Personally, I think there’s room in the Fediverse for an app with a “strong algorithm” provided it’s completely open ofc.

    My biggest issue with algorithms isn’t the fact they exist, but that they’re proprietary black boxes so no one truly knows how it’s being manipulated

    • @dx1
      link
      1
      edit-2
      17 minutes ago

      Remember when Musk took over Twitter and “open sourced” the algorithm, although it was impossible to reconstruct anything from what was given, and contained clear signs of being edited and incriminating details suggesting content categorization and prioritization?

      What I really want to see is Facebook’s algorithm, because it seems to just produce a neverending stream of alt-right bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Fwiw Tiktok apparently just open sourced their algorithm a week or so ago.

      I wonder if loops will provide it as an option

    • JaggedRobotPubes
      link
      English
      40
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      We should be able to select different fully open source algorithms from a drop down menu, and load custom ones from fediversealgorithmmenuwithdescriptions dot org, including “no algorithm”.

      I assume that’s like a billion hours of work, but, goals.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 hours ago

        When you sort your feed by hot vs top vs new, that’s already what you’re doing kinda.

        But the platform has to have the data to support the algorithm, so you can’t just “load in” whatever algorithm you want. Besides, that sounds like a security nightmare for the platform lol

      • @grue
        link
        English
        3211 hours ago

        “No algorithm” would load nothing at all. Everything is an “algorithm,” including listing all posts in chronological order.

        Wanting “no algorithm” is like wanting food with “no chemicals” in it and not realizing that carbs, fats, proteins, etc. are “chemicals.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          But when someone says they want no chemicals in their food, you know exactly what they mean. This is just being a bit pedantic, I think.

          • @leadore
            link
            21 hour ago

            Exactly. Every time I see someone post that “akshully, chronological order is also an algorithm” (which I see a lot), it makes me think of the old “what you are calling Linux is akshully GNU/Linux” thing. Please people, let that go.

            Because you know perfectly well that when we talk about “algorithms” we’re specifically referring to corporate social media manipulative algorithms designed to increase engagement, NOT a simple sort of posts by date or number of upvotes. mkay?

          • @grue
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Noble gases are chemicals too, damn it!

            The only thing that isn’t “chemicals” is literally just vacuum.