Summary

A swath of Democratic-led states and civil rights groups have filed the first lawsuits challenging executive orders Donald Trump signed after taking office, including one that seeks to roll back birthright citizenship in the US.

A coalition of 18 Democratic-led states along with the District of Columbia and the city of San Francisco filed a lawsuit in federal court in Boston on Tuesday arguing the Republican president’s effort to end birthright citizenship is a flagrant violation of the US constitution.

That lawsuit followed a pair of similar cases filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, immigrant organizations and an expectant mother in the hours after Trump signed the executive order, marking the first major litigation challenging parts of his agenda since he took office.

Edit: Count is now 22 states. Thanks empireoflove2!

  • @Donjuanme
    link
    932 days ago

    Why do we have to sue to have our founding document respected?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Because it’s all you can do. However, this will almost certainly go all the way to the corrupt supreme court, who will find in favour of trump, and change the constitution.

      • Tiefling IRL
        link
        fedilink
        242 days ago

        At that point I hope the blue states realize there’s nothing to gain from remaining in the union

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          152 days ago

          Remember a year ago when Texas was talking about seceding, and how everyone pointed out that there was no legal mechanism for them to do that ?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            413 hours ago

            Given the fact that Texas will threaten to secede at the drop of a hat and have been doing so since they lost in the civil war. Well it comes across as hollow and annoying at best.

          • toomanypancakes
            link
            English
            322 days ago

            If laws don’t matter, neither does a legal mechanism.

            • @DarkFuture
              link
              English
              102 days ago

              Yeah, we’re starting to learn that a lot of “rules” aren’t actually written down, and even if they are, who cares if they aren’t enforced? The Trump era will teach an entire generation of Americans that lawlessness is subjective and always profitable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            182 days ago

            There’s never a legal way to overthrow a corrupt government. The US didn’t gain its independence from England through legal channels.

        • @DarkFuture
          link
          English
          32 days ago

          Yup.

          Take our massive economies and our larger number of military personnel and do our own thing. Not much of a loss.

      • @DarkFuture
        link
        English
        122 days ago

        Yup.

        And you can 100% expect them to try to use the Supreme Court to amend the constitution to keep Trump (or his unelected successor) in power at the end of this 4 year stretch. That or they’ll declare some state of emergency and “postpone” elections.

        This is anti-democratic felon rapist whose party has enabled him every step of the way and already removed women’s rights. They will absolutely attempt what I just described.

    • @DarkFuture
      link
      English
      15
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Because Republicans spent years radicalizing the dumbest members of our society, which unfortunately now include over half of voting Americans, using fear-based propaganda, in order to put themselves in a position to dismantle our democracy for their own benefit.

    • @nialv7
      link
      72 days ago

      What else do you expect? Trump struck down by lightning as soon as he signed it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -2622 hours ago

      Republicans don’t want to respect 14th amendment, Democrats don’t want to respect 2nd amendment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Because it was intentionally written to be vague in places. As time passes, and sensibilities change; This allows current people to debate and reinterpret what those passages mean for them.