I mean I’m not into it, but I would also not call sex between anthropomorphic cartoon characters that take on the qualities of animals the same as animal sex. It’s basically mythical creature sex. I mean would it be animal sex if someone was into, for example, centaur sex? Because we’re essentially talking about creatures that look somewhat like the animals they are supposed to be, but more more like humans.
I have yet to see a rabbit or a mouse that look especially close to Bugs or Mickey.
Again, not my thing, but I wouldn’t classify it in the same category as bestiality and I would guess that a lot of people into that would not be into actual animal sex at all.
It’s not the same at all. A little human girl in a cartoon is still a little human girl. You show me one real mouse that looks like Mickey.
Again, is being into centaur sex being into bestiality? Or can we acknowledge the fact that fictional creatures are not the same as real ones?
People actually into bestiality help perpetuate animal cruelty. Lumping the people into anthropomorphic animal sex in cartoons into that group is really unfair and unkind to them just because you don’t approve of their specific kink.
Yes I’d say centaur sex is beastiality. It’s not a human. Drawing represent things. Just as you said a drawing of a little is still a little girl. A drawing of an animal is still an animal.
I’m not going to give anyone a pass because it’s “anthropomorphic”. That’s a cop out.
Ouch, some folks ain’t gonna like this comment
Oh I know. Im not sorry. They know why wanking to animal sex isn’t right.
Drawings can’t hurt you, dawg.
While I do agree, we definitely should not venture into drawing underage girls having sex. It’s a drawing but it’s still fucked up
Why bring that up? We’re having a wholesome convo about bestiality and you gotta ruin it? Smh my head.
Never said they do. I’m just describing a certain subset of people.
I mean I’m not into it, but I would also not call sex between anthropomorphic cartoon characters that take on the qualities of animals the same as animal sex. It’s basically mythical creature sex. I mean would it be animal sex if someone was into, for example, centaur sex? Because we’re essentially talking about creatures that look somewhat like the animals they are supposed to be, but more more like humans.
I have yet to see a rabbit or a mouse that look especially close to Bugs or Mickey.
Again, not my thing, but I wouldn’t classify it in the same category as bestiality and I would guess that a lot of people into that would not be into actual animal sex at all.
Im pretty sure you’re not into it. But it’s the same thing as little girl cartoon sex. It ain’t right.
It’s not the same at all. A little human girl in a cartoon is still a little human girl. You show me one real mouse that looks like Mickey.
Again, is being into centaur sex being into bestiality? Or can we acknowledge the fact that fictional creatures are not the same as real ones?
People actually into bestiality help perpetuate animal cruelty. Lumping the people into anthropomorphic animal sex in cartoons into that group is really unfair and unkind to them just because you don’t approve of their specific kink.
Yes I’d say centaur sex is beastiality. It’s not a human. Drawing represent things. Just as you said a drawing of a little is still a little girl. A drawing of an animal is still an animal.
I’m not going to give anyone a pass because it’s “anthropomorphic”. That’s a cop out.
Again- people actually into bestiality are promoting animal cruelty. These people are not. I have no idea why you can’t see the difference.
It can not promote animal cruelty and still be disgusting. It doesn’t need to be I/0.
But anyways, I don’t want to spend my morning talking anymore about this subject.
Whether or not you personally find it disgusting and whether or not it is the same as bestiality are two very different things.
This is uncomfortably close to “men who sexually assault little boys” is a subset of homosexuality. It is not.