• @SoftTeeth
    link
    8
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If SCOTUS attempts to change the constitution, without the required support of congress, then it gives the ok for the American people to remove them.

    Technically they haven’t done anything illegal yet

    • @WraithGear
      link
      English
      31 day ago

      They are there to interpret the law. The plan isn’t to remove or challenge it, but to change its meaning into however they want. There is no -lawful- means of removing them from power.

      • @SoftTeeth
        link
        124 hours ago

        Again the constitution isn’t law, but laws are required to adhere to as close to the constitution as possible, and those changes cannot be made by Judges

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 hours ago

          They literally can. I don’t know if you’re just ignorant, but the supreme court has the authority to interpret the constitution and decide what it “really” means. If they decide that the 14th only applies to people exclusively under US jurisdiction (like they’ve indicated is the plan) then that’s the way it is. It doesn’t matter how shitty or blatantly wrong their argument is. It only matters what they decide, and whatever they decide becomes de jure fact. There’s no legal method to counter it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        324 hours ago

        In theory a twelve gauge and a dream.

        In practice a civil war which would kill millions and most likely dissolution or heavily decentralize the federal government.

      • @SoftTeeth
        link
        1
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        The constitution covers that too

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          020 hours ago

          If you’re holding out hope that Congress would impeach and remove any Supreme Court Justice, let alone all the ones who need removing, I have a bridge to sell you.