@[email protected] to memesEnglish • 18 days agoHe's not wrong.lemmy.caimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up11.38Karrow-down121 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imageHe's not wrong.lemmy.ca@[email protected] to memesEnglish • 18 days agomessage-square95fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-4•17 days agoI’d argue that’s not true if the lighting is baked into the map.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•edit-217 days agoDoes it matter? The screen still has to display it, and GPU render it, even if no RT is involved.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-3•17 days agoThe GPU renders the map no matter if there is lighting baked in our not. It’s exactly the same operation. And depending on your display tech, brighter pixels might actually use slightly less energy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•17 days agoYou can hardly argue that the lamp itself is using energy when “not a lamp” is using exactly as much energy
I’d argue that’s not true if the lighting is baked into the map.
Does it matter? The screen still has to display it, and GPU render it, even if no RT is involved.
The GPU renders the map no matter if there is lighting baked in our not. It’s exactly the same operation. And depending on your display tech, brighter pixels might actually use slightly less energy.
But they still use energy.
You can hardly argue that the lamp itself is using energy when “not a lamp” is using exactly as much energy