Comic book writer and producer Marc Bernardin has posted on Blue Sky about the future of the comic book adaptation of Neil Gaiman’s Anansi Boys. Bernadin adapted the series from Neil Gaiman’s original novel, drawn by Shaun Martinborough, and published by Dark Horse Comics. It is one of a number of such titles from the publisher that have adapted some of Neil Gaiman’s adult fantasy works, including American Gods and Norse Mythology.

The last page of Anansi Boys #7 advertised a new issue #8 for February, but this will no longer be published. In recent months, Tortoise Media, NY Magazine, and Vulture have reported detailed allegations of abuse by a number of women against Gaiman. Gaiman has denied anything non-consensual.

Bernadin wrote with the accompanying visual from above, “Last week, Anansi Boys 7 hit stands. It will be the last issue. Dark Horse will not release a trade. I am incredibly proud of the work we did on the book. @smartinbrough.bsky.social 's lines were fantastic, @sotocolor.bsky.social 's hues were extraordinary, @david-mack.bsky.social slayed the covers. But all of that pales. Anansi Boys is about two brothers, twins. One is meek, timid, like a flopsy, set-upon puppy. The other brother is narcissistic, hedonistic, governed by nothing other than his own pursuit of sensation and pleasure. They seem so different, but they are very much flip sides of the same coin. Literally. I never gave too much thought about that. Until now. My heart breaks for the survivors and any pain seeing these books on the shelves might have caused.”

  • @Meeshall65
    link
    English
    -91 day ago

    This cancelling of people, i can understand. The cancelling of art made by those people is beyond me. Will we destroy the Mona Lisa if we should find evidence that Leonardo was a sexual predator?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 hours ago

      It’s an adaptation of an existing novel. Your analogy falls apart under the most minute of scrutiny

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 hours ago

      also in addition too the other comments: Davinci had no publisher like dark horse. The artist is free to continue creating art (no idea about the copyright situation about this series but in general).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 hours ago

          some did. davinci didnt. and since this is the example you came up with, i feel my point stands.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 hours ago

              did you read that? Because to me it really reads like it talks about davincis comissions. Which are not a publishing/patreoning deal. It even talks about his focus on his personal work outside those comissions. just because the word patreon is used in the article makes it support your point…

              But for you i did another quick read of his wikipedia article (do you need a link to that or can you find that on your own?) and read that in the last 7years of his life he had the vatican as a patreon for his art. Before he had two other patreon for shorter times mostly for his engeneering, cartographing and organizing talent.

              and to finish this petty argument of: even when all you claim is true. artist are still able to produce art without a publisher. which was my first point. heck even you can shoot him a donation so they are not as dependent on a publisher deal, if you feel that person deserves more funds. My original point was that a publisher breaking a deal, does not prevent the art from beeing made in principle. and this point stands imo, as i didnt see any conter argument against it yet.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      English
      39 hours ago

      Are you suggesting Dark Horse should be forced to publish Gaiman’s book?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      471 day ago

      Canceling future stuff and destroying existing stuff are not the same, you can tell because they use different words.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 day ago

        I mean, if the story has a planned ending and you’ve destroyed any chance of that planned ending ever happening - you’ve effectively destroyed the existing media. I don’t really see the difference between the two in this instance.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          29 hours ago

          Broadly speaking, the difference is that the artists around the project are going to move on to different projects while Gaiman is frozen out of anything new.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          So, are all the shows that are canceled without an ending also destroyed? Cuz I mean most of those aren’t even canceled for a reason, like this is (other than money).

          Sure, they aren’t story-complete, but they aren’t gone, they are still available to consume, as are the first 7 releases of this series.

          Just treat it like a cliffhanger. Lots of stories end that way on purpose.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 day ago

      Difference between art which already exists and art which is being created. No one is saying to destroy what Gaiman has already made. They simply said they aren’t supporting his creation of more art on account of him being an asshole.

      • @Meeshall65
        link
        English
        41 day ago

        Of course you can decide not to buy/use/watch it. Thats up to you

      • @Meeshall65
        link
        English
        31 day ago

        Still: art in itself is just art. Either good or bad. Thats not depending on the morals of the maker

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          614 hours ago

          Yes and gaiman can still make art, even if nobody buys it. Not supporting problematic artists is not the same as cancelling their art.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 day ago

        Is he involved in it? Like Dead boy detectives is he involved? I guess at the very least he is getting money for it.

          • @I_Has_A_Hat
            link
            English
            15 hours ago

            The beast at this point has enough money to comfortably live 10 lifetimes without earning any additional income. I don’t think it matters one single shit whether we try to “starve” it or not. He’ll be long dead before it affects him in any way.