• BornVolcano
    link
    31 year ago

    Saying they defeated fascists doesn’t imply there are no more fascists left.

    I can say I hunted deer, that doesn’t mean there are no more deer left in the wild.

    By referring to “fascists” (the people) rather than fascism (the ideology) you narrow your description to more accurately present the scope of your statement. The German Nazi party were fascists. They were defeated. We defeated fascists that day. There are more fascists, but that doesn’t mean we didn’t fight and defeat some number of fascists.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I was about to agree with you but then I reread the statement you responded to and it’s:

      Yeah fascism really ended in 1945 /s

      So your suggestion is to put it:

      fascists really ended in 1945

      Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m not a native speaker but that’s a weird phrasing. For me it implies (or rather implicates) that all fascists ended because to end is a very strong verb semantically when applied to humans. And honestly, I wouldn’t use it at all.

      • sweetviolentblush
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        In internet slang the /s means they were making a sarcastic statement, so they were being sarcastic when they said “Yeah fascism really ended in 1945 /s”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Yes I know. I was referring to the answer:

          Replace the word with “fascists” and it makes so much more logical sense. And this is why wording matters

          Which I interpreted as … well you know. I’m not going to perpetuate this argument.

      • BornVolcano
        link
        11 year ago

        I meant in the original post haha. Since their comment was that fascism didn’t end in 1945. If the post had said “winning against fascists”, it would make more logical sense