• 1st panel : spongebob in a stand caption reads “Single trans woman”
  • 2nd panel : a huge crowd gathered around spongebob
  • 3rd panel : spongebob adds a little paper on his table saying “I don’t use my penis”
  • 4th panel : the whole crowd left.
  • Chloë (she/her)OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    510 days ago

    At some point I think it’s just better not to tell people you’re trans , like If you have a neovagina and pass there is literally no visible difference.

    • Ada
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3010 days ago

      I have no desire to blend in to cishet society. I spent too long hiding in a closet to just get in to a new one, even if it is more comfortable than the old one

      • Chloë (she/her)OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 days ago

        You make a good point 👍🏻 I was moreso arguing for not disclosing you’re trans in situations it might be difficult. I whole heartedly agree with you otherwise<3

    • Norah (pup/it/she)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 days ago

      Bottom surgery leaves a fair few scars, and neovagina’s don’t always function in the same way. This might work for trans women that are straight, but I doubt it would work for those that are sapphic. Someone’s going to notice if they’re eating you out (please enjoy my dumb joke about men not giving head).

      • Ada
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 days ago

        I had bottom surgery 7 years ago, and my scars are pretty much invisible these days.

        That being said, I still don’t think people would mistake it for a cis vagina in the long term

      • Chloë (she/her)OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 days ago

        I’ve heard that even a gynecologist could be “fooled”, there is a lot of info about neovaginas out there I’m not sure what is true and what isn’t :/ (Joke enjoyed c: )

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 days ago

      That sounds rather dangerous. There seems to be a not-insignificant number of people who would get irrationally angry at being tricked into having “gay sex” and thus being turned gay, and the only way they know to ungay themselves is through violence.

      • @SamboT
        link
        English
        310 days ago

        I dont understand how you guys think its okay to trick someone like that. How can you not respect a partner like that? How would it be irrational to be very upset by that?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 days ago

          I say irrational to describe the degree of anger. Being upset about it? Sure. I don’t expect to understand it, but I can accept that it’s upsetting to some people.

          • @SamboT
            link
            English
            29 days ago

            Non-consensual sex is pretty egregious… I hope you understand that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              39 days ago

              Of course. There’s the obvious requirement of consent before the act and continuous consent throughout the course of the act. Things become a lot less straightforward when it comes to revoking consent after the fact. I’m not convinced that violence is ever warranted in these scenarios.

              • @SamboT
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Violence is never warranted but theres no confusion about consent. You cant get consent if you arent giving the terms to consent to. Consent means an understanding. This isnt iTunes terms and conditions.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  19 days ago

                  The part that isn’t straightforward is what information is needed in order to make an informed decision and what is reasonable to provide to a sexual partner. It’s not something I’ve thought about before so I don’t have an answer to this, but the fact that I have to put more than a few minutes of thought into it is why I qualify as non-straightforward.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19 days ago

                Angrily revoking consent after the fact is very common and understandable when STDs are involved and undisclosed.

                There aren’t a lot of other examples I know of, maybe if one party know they were related and didn’t say anything.

                But do you see the issue now?

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      English
      59 days ago

      Not if you’re actually looking for a happy partnership. It’s one thing if it actually doesn’t come up, but if you’re hiding it from a partner, well, you’re hiding an aspect of your life from your partner.

    • @SamboT
      link
      English
      -1110 days ago

      Thats so gross