The World War II-era “Simple Sabotage Field Manual” is full of steps that office workers can take to resist leadership.

  • BETYU
    link
    fedilink
    -928 days ago

    this was to fight real fascism not just the people you don’t like.

    • WatDabney
      link
      fedilink
      468 days ago

      Which is exactly why it’s relevant today.

      Fascists don’t magically stop being fascists just because you happen to hate the same people they do.

      • BETYU
        link
        fedilink
        -518 days ago

        they do if you delude the meaning of what a Fascists is. in that way we can all be Fascists because it does not mean anything anymore. and who do you think that helps. that’s what happens when you play with the meaning of words they become meaningless.

        • WatDabney
          link
          fedilink
          418 days ago

          Right, but in the case of the current US and the current administration, the term is accurate.

          Fascism is a far-right (check) political ideology characterized by authoritarianism (check), extreme nationalism (check), and the suppression of opposition (check), often led by a dictatorial leader (check). It emphasizes the subordination of individual interests to the perceived good of the nation or race (check) and typically involves a centralized autocratic government (check).

          • BETYU
            link
            fedilink
            -498 days ago

            you just say that because your not politically aligned with the current administration. you would support all of this if it was your side doing it and you would be a lot more rigid and forgiving in your definition of Fascists for them. for your political opponents a very broad definition of fascism. for the side you Aline with a very narrow rigid definition of fascism to be lot more forgiving. calling people fascists is just a political game that most people eye roll at now. it has lost all its effect its politically meaningless the only thing it does now is show your a lefty or a communist. and people eye roll at that to.

            • WatDabney
              link
              fedilink
              298 days ago

              It’s really sort of astonishing that every single thing you said here is wrong. And mostly misspelled to boot.

                • WatDabney
                  link
                  fedilink
                  128 days ago

                  I clearly and concisely supported my contention that the term “fascist” is appropriate to this administration.

                  You responded with a string of laughably false ad hominems, painfully transparent paychological projection and a pathetic attempt to just dismiss my argument out of hand. The one thing you did NOT respond with is even the faintest trace of intellectual integrity, so there’s no point in trying to pursue thecdebate any further.

                  Oh and… a thing that people like you seem to generally fail to grasp - you don’t really fool anyone. The lurkers can see what you’re doing just as clearly as I can.

            • @ChexMax
              link
              English
              128 days ago

              I always think it’s so crazy when Republicans say crap like this. Democrats hate our leadership, just not as much as we hate your leadership. We absolutely would not follow any democratic leaders into the dark, we barely follow them in the light.

            • @gothic_lemons
              link
              English
              118 days ago

              Sell me on Trump not being a fascist please

                • @gothic_lemons
                  link
                  English
                  48 days ago

                  Well that seems silly. Care to explain what we should do?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    48 days ago

                    Do you have a definition of fascist you approve of, or would argue for? It’s absolutely true that some people throw around words as dismissal but that doesn’t mean we just all throw up our hands and say all words are meaningless.

                    Ultimately, the fight over ‘fascism’ is a fight to define ‘fascism.’ Having no definition is not a position to argue from. It’s ignorance. Arguing on behalf of ignorance is just noise. Even if no one else shares your definition, decide what it is, then argue for that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              118 days ago

              That is not what I asked. You’re saying it’s being used incorrectly, which means you have a definition in mind which isn’t being met. What is that definition?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  The Encyclopaedia Britannica definition?

                  “Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from one another, they had many characteristics in common, including extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a Volksgemeinschaft (German: “people’s community”), in which individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the nation.”

                  Or maybe the Webster’s Dictionary definition?

                  "a populist political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and by forcible suppression of opposition”

                  Because by those definitions “fascism” is not being used incorrectly.

                  If you have an alternate definition which supports your claim, you’ll need to provide it yourself.

        • @Glytch
          link
          English
          38 days ago

          Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.

      • BETYU
        link
        fedilink
        -388 days ago

        yes of course that is very smurt because doing this makes people take that very seriously. how does it feel to help nazis make that word have no impact anymore.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 days ago

        It’s scary how many signs there are in this current administration. And they’re not even hiding it.

    • @GalacticGrapefruit
      link
      English
      118 days ago

      Did you not see Musk do a fucking Sieg Heil on live TV last week and go on tour to shake hands with his fellow NeoNazis in Germany??

      Have you missed the part where Trump said he fully planned on being a dictator? How about the 900-page manual where his lackeys described in detail how to do it?

        • @GalacticGrapefruit
          link
          English
          88 days ago

          Refusing to give a Machiavellian narcissist attention generally works best BEFORE they rise to global power, sweetie.

        • @Duamerthrax
          link
          English
          68 days ago

          Musk is also a eugenics supporter.

    • @Gammelfisch
      link
      English
      88 days ago

      You should join your comrades in the Russian infantry and enjoy the NATO tungsten.

    • @trolololol
      link
      English
      27 days ago

      Corporate/Fascists want you to spot the difference between them