• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    148 days ago

    Or not making the same mistake twice, and opting for something decentralised that your company owns, such as your own Mastodon instance.

    • palordrolap
      link
      fedilink
      78 days ago

      Yeah, but then they have to pay someone to maintain it. And low though that cost may be, it’s precisely the sort of thing that C-levels like to cut when they feel like pretending that they actually do something.

      It’s a hard thing for a C-level’s ego to set something up that they know someone else is going to cut later, or worse that they might be the one to “have to” cut it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        They have to pay someone to manage the account in the first place. No reason that worker can’t do both.

        • palordrolap
          link
          fedilink
          128 days ago

          Typing in a box on a website provided by someone else can be done by practically anyone, even the boss themselves at a pinch. Heck, some of them love doing that.

          Maintaining a server (or a service on a server) requires someone with more skills, which generally costs more money.

          • madjo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Some smart entrepreneur could offer a Mastodon-server-in-a-box service, where companies only pay hosting fees for company-name.social and a social network employee.

            • @PapstJL4U
              link
              English
              16 days ago

              all cost more than just making an account on established service. The cost of changing from Twitter to whatever is probably smaller than half a year of selfhosting or aaS.