Summary

German lawmakers are debating whether to pursue a ban on the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), but many fear the move could backfire ahead of the Feb. 23 national election.

The proposal, backed by 124 lawmakers, seeks a court review of whether the AfD is unconstitutional.

Critics, including Chancellor Olaf Scholz, warn a failed attempt could strengthen the party, which is polling at 20%.

The debate underscores concerns over the AfD’s extremism but also the risks of fueling its anti-establishment narrative.

  • Ogmios
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68 days ago

    technocratic

    I was unaware this was a feature of society unique to the political far right.

    • Justin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      228 days ago

      technocracy != Elon Musk as president

      technocracy is when you have political scientists and engineers as politicians, not billionaires and lawyers.

      • Ogmios
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -58 days ago

        In common usage, I’d argue it just means a society which is run by technology rather than people, which everyone is trying to do these days.

        • @FooBarrington
          link
          English
          57 days ago

          That might be what people think the word means when they first hear it, but that doesn’t mean we should use it that way.

          • Ogmios
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Well if you actually want to communicate with others outside of academia, you’re going to have to get used to attempting to understand people rather than constantly trying to “fix” them.

            • @FooBarrington
              link
              English
              57 days ago

              So we should just do away with definitions, and go with whatever people think a word means the first time they hear it? Why?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 days ago

                If one person or a few people have a definition wrong, that’s a thing that can be corrected.

                If the majority of people think that’s the definition, and it’s been that way for decades, then you have the definition wrong.

                • @FooBarrington
                  link
                  English
                  16 days ago

                  Do you have data to show that a majority of people have been missing “technocracy” for decades?

              • Ogmios
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                The point is that you have to make a good faith effort for communication to be possible, which you are not doing here. Language evolves organically, not by the dictate of a legally mandated authority.

                • @FooBarrington
                  link
                  English
                  26 days ago

                  When the “good faith effort” requires changing definitions, it’s not a good faith effort from the other side.

                  • Ogmios
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    6 days ago

                    That’s exactly my point. If you come into a conversation and start declaring the definitions have to be different from how the speaker uses their own words, because people they’ve never even met said so, that’s not a good faith effort.