So creating a new repo on GitHub, you get a set of getting started steps. They changed the default branchname to “main” from “master” due to its connotations with slavery.

When I create a new repo now, the initial getting started steps recommend creating a branch named “master” as opposed to “main” as it was a while ago.

It’s especially weird since the line git branch -M master is completely unnecessary, since git init still sets you up with a “master” branch.

Disclaimer: I have a bunch of private repos, and my default branchnames are pretty much all “master”.

Is this a recent change?

Edit: Mystery solved, my default branchname is “master”. Thanks [email protected] !

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    437 days ago

    God I wish. The change to “main” was pointless and unnecessary. It’s almost like people want to find problems when there aren’t any.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      226 days ago

      I prefer main simply because it faster to type. I propose main branches be renamed to “m”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 days ago

      Honestly I feel like people who had an issue with this were just as much making an issue out of nothing. I personally also think that “master” is just as much a normal and valid name as “main”, and to me the rename kinda felt like performative bullshit. But at the same time it’s just a name, if it makes people happy I don’t really care either. Nowadays I tend to use main, but it’s not something I really pay attention to.

    • @count_dongulus
      link
      English
      477 days ago

      Americans and their silly performative outrage

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      English
      23
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I like it, because it forced people not to assume master is the main branch. If something is common enough to almost be a standard, but it’s not actually a standard, it’s just waiting for disaster.

      These assumptions cause unnecessary breakage, but people will make them unless forced not to.

        • @FooBarrington
          link
          English
          37 days ago

          And yet not everyone used to use master, so scripts kept breaking for no good reason.

          Either make it a standard, or stop assuming it’s a standard. De-facto isn’t good enough.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            67 days ago

            Having a magical standard fairy waive a wand isn’t going to fix scripts, or stop them from breaking.

            • @FooBarrington
              link
              English
              07 days ago

              What? If there’s an actual standard, it will stop scripts from breaking, because the assumption that master is the main branch will always be true.

              • clif
                link
                English
                26 days ago

                I’ll find something else to screw up and cause it to break, don’t worry.