• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 hours ago

    Trump agreed with the working class that the economy is in the shitter. He lied about wanting to fix it.

    Harris declared anyone who thought the economy was in the shitter was hallucinating, and they just need to shut up, and vote for her, because “I’m not Donald”.

    That’s the difference. And Harris’ strategy was a losing one.

    No leftist has any illusion on if either oligarch truly wanted to represent us, rather than their actual constituents: other oligarchs.

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      04 hours ago

      So lying to the working class is your winning strategy.

      Thanks, Lenin.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        I suppose that’s a take… I mean, the Dems could of course lie to the working class, just to win votes. Like they did under Obama, Clinton, etc. Or, they could, you know, not lie to the working class, and actually enact change?

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          -13 hours ago

          You just told me the difference between Harris and Trump is that Trump lied to the working class, and that’s why Harris lost.

          The only logical conclusion is that you believe lying to the working class is a winning strategy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            The difference is Harris lied to the working class too, by stating the economy is doing great. Or, she’s completely disconnected with the reality of the working class?

            The only logical conclusion is that you believe lying to the working class is a winning strategy.

            No, that’s your very, very, myopic reading of what I wrote… Especially after clarifying. It’s almost like you’re being purposefully obtuse, or something.

            • @FlowVoid
              link
              English
              03 hours ago

              The economy is traditionally measured by GDP growth, unemployment, and inflation. All those numbers were good when Harris was running.

              If you want to redefine “good economy”, that’s on you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 hours ago

                he economy is traditionally measured by GDP growth, unemployment, and inflation. All those numbers were good when Harris was running.

                Ah, so we only care about the numbers that show if the economy is working for the oligarchs, and not the working class?

                I don’t care if the economy is good for oligarchs, and makes it easy and profitable to exploit the working class… And, honestly, the working class voters don’t care if stonks go up, if their stomachs are empty.

                If you want to redefine “good economy”, that’s on you.

                I’m not “redefining” a “good economy”… There are many numbers behind an economy… Wealth distribution, maternal deaths, infant deaths, educational outcomes, monetary velocity, etc etc.

                We can pick any set of numbers to talk about, but objectively, the economy is not good, nor has it been good, for the working class since 2002 or so.

                • @FlowVoid
                  link
                  English
                  03 hours ago

                  Low unemployment only works for oligarchs?

                  Low inflation only works for oligarchs?