Many in the White House were “rattled” by her refusal to directly answer a question about Edward Snowden, according to a person familiar with the White House’s thinking.

Summary

Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination for director of national intelligence faces growing concern after a contentious hearing in Washington. Senators questioned her suitability for the role.

Gabbard’s reluctance to directly label Edward Snowden as a traitor raised doubts. Critics highlighted her unpreparedness and evasive responses regarding past praise for Snowden.

Republican senators expressed skepticism while Democratic senators vowed to oppose her nomination on the floor. Ultimately, the committee vote remains uncertain.

The White House stands firmly behind Gabbard.

  • @takeheart
    22•2 days ago

    One of her arguments against the allegation of her spewing Russian talking points was that she doesn’t follow Russian Propaganda.

    Truthfulness aside, that argument is not the elegant dodge that she probably thinks it is. Because that speaks against her informedness. As someone applying for this job she should be interested or better yet well versed in what current Russian propaganda is, how it is disseminated, who the target audience is, how well it is working, and how it relates to the wider goals of the Russian regime.

    Strangely enough Robert Kenney also made use of a similar defensive veil a couple of times. Well I’m not a medical expert, so I really couldn’t tell you. 🙄 Bro, why are you applying for this position then?