• @DreamlandLividity
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    And you are incapable of hearing criticism of Trump without firing off about it.

    You are delusional. I criticize Trump myself in multiple comments on this thread.

    It’s relevant that the rich male rapist president is proposing changes that make it easier for rich male rapists to get away with it and trash their victims’ reputations when they speak up.

    It is absolutely irrelevant who proposes changes when debating whether those changes are good or bad. Even Hitler enacted some good laws. Does not make him less Horrible person or excuse other things he did. But my whole complaint is that so many people are now unable/unwilling to discuss the actual policy on it’s own merit and you are proving me right.

    Instead of forming your own opinion on the policy based on rational arguments, all you can do is “TrUmP bAd, PoLiCy MuSt Be BaD.”

    • Log in | Sign up
      link
      English
      13 hours ago

      Which part of this are you on board with?

      changes that make it easier for rich male rapists to get away with it and trash their victims’ reputations when they speak up.

      Because all I see is opportunities for rich boys’ lawyers the chance to disrupt a school exclusion meeting and turn it into a media circus debating the victim’s sex life in detail, and if you think that isn’t how that plays out, you haven’t been paying attention.

      Your point is entirely based on trashing other people’s skepticism that the rapist president might not have young rape victims interests at heart, and I have to call out your gullability on that point. It’s absolutely not irrelevant that Trump himself is a rapist, and repeatedly insisting that it is defies logic.

      • @DreamlandLividity
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Because all I see is opportunities for rich boys’ lawyers

        Because you are willfully blind.

        turn it into a media circus

        Title IX hearings are not public, nor is anyone arguing they should be public. It’s just a strawman argument you and people like you are making.

        Your point is entirely based on trashing other people’s skepticism that the rapist president might not have young rape victims interests at heart, and I have to call out your gullability on that point.

        I am trashing peoples inability to actually think about and evaluate a policy for themselves. So yes, I trash people who have to resort to trashing Trump instead of being able to intelligently discuss a policy.

        It’s not like I believe Trump actually cares for fairness. Probably just broken clock being right twice a day.

        I am not the gullible one here.