r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

  • @RightHandOfIkaros
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Anything before the GameCube, PS2, and Original Xbox.

    So PS1, Sega Saturn, and Nintendo64 and older are “retro.”

    The Atari 2600 and Colecovision are “vintage.”

    Pong and the Magnavox Odyssey are “antique.”

    • @cybervseas
      link
      English
      39 hours ago

      What about Dreamcast? 🤔

      • @RightHandOfIkaros
        link
        English
        27 hours ago

        Original Xbox, GameCube, PS2, Dreamcast - “old.”

        PS3, Xbox 360, Wii - “modern.”

        PS4, Xbox One - “previous gen”

        PS5, Xbox Series - “current gen”

        Nintendo Switch - “2015 smartphone”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 hours ago

          But the PS3 / 360 are coming up to 20 years old. Hell, one of my adult colleagues was born after the 360 was released. Can they really be considered modern anymore?