r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

  • @cybervseas
    link
    English
    41 month ago

    What about Dreamcast? 🤔

    • @RightHandOfIkaros
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      Original Xbox, GameCube, PS2, Dreamcast - “old.”

      PS3, Xbox 360, Wii - “modern.”

      PS4, Xbox One - “previous gen”

      PS5, Xbox Series - “current gen”

      Nintendo Switch - “2015 smartphone”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        But the PS3 / 360 are coming up to 20 years old. Hell, one of my adult colleagues was born after the 360 was released. Can they really be considered modern anymore?

        • @BoxOfFeet
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          I have a hard time thinking of a console that came with HDMI as anything but modern.

        • @RightHandOfIkaros
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          “Modernism” is a term used to refer to art and culture from 1930s-1940s America. Searching for something like furniture or architecture in that style would mean you use search terms like “modern furniture” or “modern architecture.” Can that really be considered “modern” anymore?

          When the PS4 and Xbox One are no longer the “previous gen” I will be calling them “next gen,” as that is the term most associated with those consoles. Even after the consoles were released and well into their lifespan they were still called “next gen.”

          I call future consoles that haven’t released yet “upcoming gen” or “future gen” interchangeably.