@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 17 hours agoimaginemander.xyzimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1465arrow-down116
arrow-up1449arrow-down1imageimaginemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 17 hours agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareTar_AlcaranlinkfedilinkEnglish-11•17 hours agoNo they won’t. They will sue you if you take your neighbors pesticide resistant seeds, sow them, douse them in pesticide so only the resistant ones survive, and sow your entire field with them.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish41•16 hours agoYes, they will. You’re taking the approach of an independent farmer that didn’t sign a contract with Monsanto. What you said mostly aligns with that scenario. For the farmer that did sign a contract with Monsanto, that is a standard and required clause, and they do enforce it.
minus-squareunalivejoylinkfedilinkEnglish34•17 hours agoClassic piracy. The original product is still there; you’re just making a copy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•14 hours agoIsn’t classic piracy boarding ships and taking all their shit at gunpoint?
minus-squareTar_AlcaranlinkfedilinkEnglish20•17 hours agoI mean, I totally agree with all forms of breaking IP law on ethical grounds. But I also recognise that it’s still breaking the law right now.
minus-squareDragon Rider (drag)linkfedilinkEnglish4•14 hours agoWhy “but”? Why are those two statements viewed as contradicting each other in tone?
minus-square@CeedoestreeslinkEnglish0•15 hours agoYou getting downvoted for stating what’s factually correct while still disagreeing with it is classic shooting the messenger.
minus-squareTlaloc_TemporallinkfedilinkEnglish5•11 hours agoThe messenger is getting shot for not bringing receipts. I was about to shoot them too, then I retrieved a receipt: https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2024/01/05/dissecting-claims-about-monsanto-suing-farmers-for-accidentally-planting-patented-seeds/
minus-squareTar_AlcaranlinkfedilinkEnglish2•6 hours agoI agree, but you aren’t. I think all IP law is stupid, but until i’m president of the universe, it’s still the law.
No they won’t.
They will sue you if you take your neighbors pesticide resistant seeds, sow them, douse them in pesticide so only the resistant ones survive, and sow your entire field with them.
Yes, they will.
You’re taking the approach of an independent farmer that didn’t sign a contract with Monsanto. What you said mostly aligns with that scenario.
For the farmer that did sign a contract with Monsanto, that is a standard and required clause, and they do enforce it.
Classic piracy. The original product is still there; you’re just making a copy.
Isn’t classic piracy boarding ships and taking all their shit at gunpoint?
I mean, I totally agree with all forms of breaking IP law on ethical grounds. But I also recognise that it’s still breaking the law right now.
Why “but”? Why are those two statements viewed as contradicting each other in tone?
You getting downvoted for stating what’s factually correct while still disagreeing with it is classic shooting the messenger.
The messenger is getting shot for not bringing receipts. I was about to shoot them too, then I retrieved a receipt: https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2024/01/05/dissecting-claims-about-monsanto-suing-farmers-for-accidentally-planting-patented-seeds/
You should be allowed to do that.
I agree, but you aren’t. I think all IP law is stupid, but until i’m president of the universe, it’s still the law.