@DytallixB to Lemmy Shitpost • 10 hours agoWhite House Faith Officeimagemessage-square70arrow-up1715arrow-down16
arrow-up1709arrow-down1imageWhite House Faith Office@DytallixB to Lemmy Shitpost • 10 hours agomessage-square70
minus-square@db2link12•6 hours agoDoes anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish19•5 hours agoYou know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•4 hours agoYep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
minus-square✺roguetrick✺link10•edit-25 hours agoYou need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
No, totally unconstitutional.
Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
What’s laws, precious?
You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
deleted by creator