That’s $3 for 15 eggs. Sadly not free-range, only cage-free.

Not sure if this is the best community for this post, does anyone have a better suggestion?

  • Flying Squid
    link
    111 hours ago

    Your idea to use capitalism to fight capitalism is noted.

    Something tells me it’s already been tried. Over and over. For around three centuries.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      110 hours ago

      And it has worked reasonably well, on net, for those centuries. As Winston Churchill popularized:

      it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time

      The same can be said for capitalism. Politicians think the answer lies in regulation, but that leads to cronyism, which is to blame for most of the crap we deal with.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying “deregulate all the things,” I’m saying we need to be arresting and jailing execs instead of fining companies (and increasing fines), busting up monopolies, etc. If that means we need to remove some regulations and whatnot, fine, but dramatically increase the penalties for breaking the law. Government needs to be as separate as possible from the market to be effective, just like a coach can’t be a good referee when their team is on the field.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        110 hours ago

        Yes, again, your pro-capitalist views are noted. And they explain a lot.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 hours ago

          👍

          If you have a suggestion for a system that is proven to work better and not devolve into authoritarianism (or at least not as quickly), I’m all ears.

          I think we’re better off fixing the system we have, which to me means:

          • more worker unions
          • harsher penalties for law-breaking corporations
          • trust busting
          • less money in politics (and less interference in the market)

          Throwing everything out and trying something new more often results in authoritarianism and/or poverty than freedom and prosperity.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            19 hours ago

            Why does it have to have been proven to work better in order to try it? What a regressive way of looking at the world.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 hours ago

              Because changing a whole economic/government system has proven to have a very high chance of failure, resulting in people being even worse off. For every success story, there are dozens of failures.

              So unless you have a gradualist/reformist approach that either has been proven or is easy to back out of, I’m not interested.