This is the very essence of the difference that should exist between a President and a King. From Federalist 69:

The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsibility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware.

The failure of the Republican party to support this kind of check on Presidential power is why we’re having this crisis now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      203 hours ago

      the mainstream news isn’t covering them… they also edited out people booing trump at the super bowl and edited in cheers

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        353 minutes ago

        You need more disruptive protests.

        Americans have been trained to clutch their pearls but that disrupting commerce with protests is wrong and that’s exactly what we’re seeing: complaints but no disruptive action so they are easily ignored.

    • djsoren19
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 hour ago

      Too cold outside for Americans to organize en masse. Gotta wait for the spring and summer for them to seriously work together.