Not really “powertripping”. Just pathetic. Consider this a notice to avoid feddit.org… I’ve unsubbed and blocked the instance.

We can’t dehumanize fascists for their choice to dehumanize everyone for things outside their control though, because that would be mean, and hurt their sociopath feefees!

Europe stool idly by throughout the 1930’s “tolerating” fascism, and the Nazi’s killed over 100 million people. Don’t make the same mistake as the radical centrists of history. Fascists will not afford you the same tolerance or courtesy.

  • @FelixCress
    -10•5 days ago

    Can you explain what you mean?

    Yes, sweetie.

    You are asking me to search for probably non-existent section of German criminal law forbidding public from calling nazis worthless piece of shit.

    At no point in this thread did anyone quote the actual law, including the guy few comments above this one. You keep commenting third time about pasting into Google - well suit yourself and do that.

    Furthermore, it is on the person claiming existence of such law to give a source, not on me to disprove it - that is basic logic.

    So, since you are so adamant, are you able to give some legal source, with quote, referring to a specific situation here?

    • @[email protected]
      2•5 days ago

      My German is pretty rusty and I’m currently on call but:

      This is in English for you, babe, so have a look through and cross reference it against what the comment claims.

      I’m not saying you’re right or wrong, just pointing out how to settle the discussion.

      Any other queries, don’t hesitate to hit me up.

      • @[email protected]
        2•5 days ago

        The constitution is the base of the criminal law. However: in our law system judges don’t say “this violates article on of our constitution so youre guilty” but use the criminal law to specify how people should be punished. So while you are in theory right this devinetively isn’t the base of how you should argue that something is illegal.

      • @FelixCress
        -6•5 days ago

        This is constitution not a criminal law, sweetie 🙄

        You don’t have a clue, do you?

          • @FelixCress
            -5•5 days ago

            Yes, sweetie. Not the criminal law.

              • @FelixCress
                1•5 days ago

                That you cannot be penalised under criminal law? Plus arguing that the OP violated constitution is ridiculous.

                • @[email protected]
                  1•5 days ago

                  Fair, I did not know individuals could not be persecuted based on the GG alone (although there seems to be some nuance on this with “mittelbare Drittwirkung” which implies that the GG should be considered even when a matter is between two private individuals, but I don’t think that is too relevant here)