Not really “powertripping”. Just pathetic. Consider this a notice to avoid feddit.org… I’ve unsubbed and blocked the instance.

We can’t dehumanize fascists for their choice to dehumanize everyone for things outside their control though, because that would be mean, and hurt their sociopath feefees!

Europe stool idly by throughout the 1930’s “tolerating” fascism, and the Nazi’s killed over 100 million people. Don’t make the same mistake as the radical centrists of history. Fascists will not afford you the same tolerance or courtesy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    25 days ago

    My German is pretty rusty and I’m currently on call but:

    This is in English for you, babe, so have a look through and cross reference it against what the comment claims.

    I’m not saying you’re right or wrong, just pointing out how to settle the discussion.

    Any other queries, don’t hesitate to hit me up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 days ago

      The constitution is the base of the criminal law. However: in our law system judges don’t say “this violates article on of our constitution so youre guilty” but use the criminal law to specify how people should be punished. So while you are in theory right this devinetively isn’t the base of how you should argue that something is illegal.

    • @FelixCress
      link
      -6
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This is constitution not a criminal law, sweetie 🙄

      You don’t have a clue, do you?

        • @FelixCress
          link
          -55 days ago

          Yes, sweetie. Not the criminal law.

            • @FelixCress
              link
              15 days ago

              That you cannot be penalised under criminal law? Plus arguing that the OP violated constitution is ridiculous.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                15 days ago

                Fair, I did not know individuals could not be persecuted based on the GG alone (although there seems to be some nuance on this with “mittelbare Drittwirkung” which implies that the GG should be considered even when a matter is between two private individuals, but I don’t think that is too relevant here)