HSR🏴☠️ to Science [email protected]English • edit-26 days agoEntropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up1446arrow-down163cross-posted to: climatememes
arrow-up1383arrow-down1imageEntropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comHSR🏴☠️ to Science [email protected]English • edit-26 days agomessage-square153fedilinkcross-posted to: climatememes
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 days agoWhy does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 days agoBecause if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 days agoTry thinking for a second. Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere
Why does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
Because if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
And places trees don’t grow?
Try thinking for a second.
Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere