Trump takes swipe at Zelensky’s leadership

“Zelensky better move fast or he is not going to have a country left,” US President Donald Trump says in a post on Truth Social.

Labelling Zelensky “a dictator”, Trump writes: “I love Ukraine, but Zelensky has done a terrible job, his country is shattered, and MILLIONS have unnecessarily died.”

Trump says in the meantime, the US is “successfully negotiating an end to the war with Russia”.

For context: Zelensky’s presidential term expired last May, however Ukraine has been under martial law since the Russian invasion in February 2022, which means presidential elections are suspended.

  • @Placebonickname
    link
    742 days ago

    We’re getting something back from Defending Ukraine, we’re getting a solid, stable democracy in a former Eastern Block state, AND we’re getting less of the “Putin Dictatorship” to deal with. The billions we’ve spent on aid are WORTH THE COST if it means there is a 1 fewer dictator to content with.

    We aren’t giving away money for an Ukraine today, we’re investing in a secure future for tomorrow.

    • Pennomi
      link
      English
      332 days ago

      Hell, most of the aid we’ve sent is weapons specifically designed to kill Russians. They were mostly old weapons anyway.

      • @foggy
        link
        292 days ago

        “aid we’ve sent” this language doesn’t explain to the brainwashed that this is money in our pockets.

        When we “send 1 billion in aid”, it usually means the US govt bought $1B of weapons from an American manufacturer and is delivering it to Ukraine.

        That isn’t $1B for Ukraine, it’s $1B for us and $1B worth of guns for Ukraine.

        • enkers
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          By “in our pockets” yes, it might go to some Americans, but you’re largely talking about taking it out of the taxes of all Americans and giving it to the 0.1%.

          Those American weapons manufacturers and their inverstors are already beyond incredibly wealthy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s always something with yall isn’t it?

            Lockheed Martin’s profit margin is something like 3%. The supply chain for the stuff they build Is the definition of “good factory job”

            None of that 97% cost goes outside of the US

            • enkers
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You’re right. Lockheed Martin’s CEO only makes a very reasonable $21,516,613 salary, 191 times their median salary. Your taxes hard at work.

        • @Sanctus
          link
          English
          42 days ago

          Too bad they have that picture of Zelensky with all the money on his desk so every time I say this they just point to that as a means of discrediting me. There is no reasoning here. We are post-consesus reality now.

      • @Placebonickname
        link
        92 days ago

        In a sense, this is a cold-war era issue, so Cold War weapons probably will do just fine, with the exception of aircraft. I would send every aircraft we can to Ukraine cause 1) They’re expensive 2) We’re already paid for them, might as well see what they can do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The right doesn’t understand that money spent stabilizing things elsewhere ends up saving money locally. That includes actual aid to poor countries, like condoms going to a country with an AIDS epidemic!