Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against “bureaucracy.”

  • JustEnoughDucks
    link
    fedilink
    11617 hours ago

    I am always confused why they don’t just sabotage the efforts? Like it would be so easy and they definitely aren’t paying attention…

    • @andros_rex
      link
      147 hours ago

      One aspect is that working in that kind of system destroys your mental health. Having to play games to hide the good things, trying to mitigate the bad things. It’s pressure.

      My state has been basically been doing Project 2025 for the past five years. I had a friend in an important position in a fascist overtaken state organization who held on for a long time, fighting the good fight - but it drains. She fought her fucking hardest, but a human being can only fight for so long.

      • Makhno
        link
        114 minutes ago

        The kurds have been fighting a war from the desert for decades, but Americans get whipped by paperwork and call it a day

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      10416 hours ago

      Different people are able to take on different levels of risk.

      Just because these people resigned doesn’t mean that some other people aren’t staying in for the purposes of being subversive, and you shouldn’t ever hear about the latter.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -15 hours ago

        That’s the thing, though. They’re not really taking risks.

        Much of what DOGE does is completely illegal and does not go through the proper channels and processes. By simply doing their jobs and forcing everything through the proper processes, they can slow down everything, maybe even to a halt, while being completely in the right and thus can’t be fired.

        Yes, it takes a mental toll, but these guys have a responsibility.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3715 hours ago

      Sabatoge can carry extremely harsh legal penalties, particularly if it has any type of lasting impact. Beyond that, just phoning it in and doing a bad job can slow things down but doesn’t actually stop it. If you’re then let go it’s on their pace, it looks worse for you and it’s less noticeable.

      A mass resignation can be the only thing some people can do. It sends a message, it gets noticed outside the organization, and it lets objective news reporting share your motivation, which would normally fall under opinion.
      It also leaves a big gap in the organization that isn’t getting anything done.

        • @FauxLiving
          link
          54 hours ago

          Guys, dumping tea in the harbor is illegal, just pay your taxes to the crown. It’s just a king, everyone has one

      • @DrFistington
        link
        -614 hours ago

        Lol getting fired doesn’t look bad. It doesn’t look like anything because you aren’t legally required to tell a future employer if you were fired, and they can’t ask the previous employer

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          311 hours ago

          It’s public information if a government employee is terminated, and there’s nothing stopping them from reaching out to the previous employer.

          • @DrFistington
            link
            39 hours ago

            State laws determine exactly what a potential employer can ask, and divulge

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              29 hours ago

              And do you think that that prevents them from disclosing that they terminated an employee for unprofessional conduct or unsatisfactory job performance?

              Further, for government employees certain details about their jobs are simply considered matters of public record. It’s not something they divulge, it was simply never private in the first place.

    • @ceenote
      link
      3516 hours ago

      Mostly the risk of jail, probably.

    • @Jimmycakes
      link
      -211 hours ago

      Because they don’t disagree with it, they only can’t bring themselves to be the ones with the blood on their hands. Otherwise they don’t care what happens.

      • @ripcord
        link
        210 hours ago

        I know everything is bad now, but not everyone is bad all the time.