@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-211 hours agofuck thismander.xyzimagemessage-square405fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down128
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imagefuck thismander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-211 hours agomessage-square405fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish90•9 hours agoAh! But it says “congress shall make no law,” not that “the president shall tweet no bullshit!”
minus-square@ContramuffinlinkEnglish16•8 hours agoThe constitution also didn’t say “the president shall give a shit about the law” Rookie mistake, IMO
minus-square@gruelinkEnglish4•4 hours agoIt literally did, minus your contemporary idiom: he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, (It’s called the “take care clause” and is part of Article II, Section 3, in case anybody wants to look it up.) Not that it matters anymore, after Trump v. United States.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-26 hours agoIt was the first time they were writing a constitution. Obviously they were rookies
minus-squareCethinlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-26 hours agoSecond. The Articles of Confederation was first and failed.
minus-squareSkaveRatlinkfedilinkEnglish12•8 hours agotbh, the founding fathers did fuck this up quite bad, by not including this
Ah! But it says “congress shall make no law,” not that “the president shall tweet no bullshit!”
The constitution also didn’t say “the president shall give a shit about the law”
Rookie mistake, IMO
It literally did, minus your contemporary idiom:
(It’s called the “take care clause” and is part of Article II, Section 3, in case anybody wants to look it up.)
Not that it matters anymore, after Trump v. United States.
It was the first time they were writing a constitution. Obviously they were rookies
Second. The Articles of Confederation was first and failed.
tbh, the founding fathers did fuck this up quite bad, by not including this