• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -912 days ago

    What’s gonna stop a pedo from changing the headers to child so that they can access the child internet where all the children are? Like it’s not a great solution to me.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      802 days ago

      your understanding of what the proposed header solution is is way off base. “protecting the kids” isn’t about keeping adults from interacting with kids in online forums, it’s about keeping the kids from accidentally seeing porn (really it’s about making the lives of sex workers more dangerous). think of it like a tv v-chip but for the internet, not as a nightclub bouncer creating two different online communities and making sure they don’t interact with eachother

    • Dojan
      link
      English
      372 days ago

      The same thing that’s stopping pedophiles today of course.

    • EamonnMR
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 days ago

      The idea isn’t to let sites restrict adults, just let them restrict kids. So there wouldn’t be a child internet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -132 days ago

        Then what’s to stop a kid from spoofing the adult headers? Wouldn’t that make the whole thing needlessly complicated?

        • @Screamium
          link
          English
          192 days ago

          Of they’re old enough to figure that out then who cares?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 days ago

            if he can do that it won’t tell anything about his intelligence, just that he has seen a video on tiktok about how to do it

            • skulblaka
              link
              fedilink
              English
              112 days ago

              It is pointless, it was always pointless and always will be. That’s the point. Before the internet kids were stealing their dad’s or brother’s Hustlers and Playboys. For most of the internet’s time so far you just click a button that says “yes I’m over 18 I pinky promise”. In the future of the internet any effort to seriously implement age verification short of submitting a DNA sample is going to be bypassed. Trying to find porn is one of only like four things that teenage boys think about, you’re not going to stop that signal. Ask anyone born before 2000 about forest porn and they’ll probably have a story about finding a couple magazines or a VHS stashed in the woods somewhere near where they lived as a kid.

              Best case, you just drive them off the mainstream sites that verify age and onto shadier websites that don’t. Or the kid that steals his dad’s ID to watch porn starts downloading and distributing them on USBs to everyone in his school, makes like $800, and then gets arrested, now this kid has an unnecessary sex crime on his record because the government really wants to know when you’re jerking off. It’s all just pointless performatism that causes more problems than it solves. And that’s not even getting into the fact that a nefarious government, which we definitely have here in America, can use that information to pinpoint especially LGBT folks via their porn viewing habits.

              So at best it’s stupid and useless and at worst it’s going to get people killed.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 days ago

                That’s the bit about this I hate, I do think porn can be dangerous especially for people who aren’t emotionally and intellectually ready for it but these systems do the opposite of help.

                Teens are curious, letting them sneak a peek at pornhub doesn’t have much risk but forcing them to learn how to accesses backroom porng R ** from seedy discord groups or similar puts them in actual genuine danger from preditors and exposes them to far more intense and possibly illegal porn.

                In my friends kids school there was a situation with a girl that had an iPhone she’d been sent by some guy on roblox, rumor was she’d ‘earned it’ when playing at a friend’s house with less strict parental supervision. It’s already hard to stop teens putting themselves in danger, especially with so many bad people out there preying on them.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 days ago

              Couldn’t a kid “borrow” their parent’s ID for the age verification? Isn’t it just as pointless today?

              • @BobQuixote
                link
                English
                12 days ago

                If I were building the feature, I’d put the “adult” header behind a password.

                But that’s a solution only for the one browser. You’d need to forbid the OS account in use from installing new apps so the kid can’t get a different browser. And now it’s starting to be inconvenient for the parent.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 days ago

                  And lock down the computer so it can’t use a bootdisk, lock out programs that can be used to circumvent locks like steam, browser plug-ins, and other VM stuff…

        • EamonnMR
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 days ago

          I think that’s up to device vendors giving parents decent controls and parents monitoring their kids devices. Which is admittedly not great, but still better than the honor system and more reasonable than submitting your license.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 days ago

      So what if it was no different than now?

      Nothing stopping adults from playing Roblox now, but we know why they are there

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      102 days ago

      Ahh yes the children

      If we cared about the children why would we permit religious institutions to exit

      Pedo central every single one of them

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 days ago

        Trust me that pisses me off. Which is why I’m just skeptical of anything to protect the children like this age verification bill.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      Lucky for the pedo, you never have to prove you are under 18, if that is what you tell the website.

    • gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 days ago

      I think he means that the headers come from the device making the call, not the one receing it, so a pedo should be able to change the headers of my device which is not that easy.
      Then yes, the receing end could simply ignore the header anyway, it would be way easier.

    • @Iheartcheese
      link
      English
      22 days ago

      Don’t worry dude at least one person sees this is a joke