• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2021 hours ago

    Anyone who has said that doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Magnetic tape is unparalleled for long-term/archival storage.

    This is completely different. For active storage, solid-state has been much better than spinning rust for a long time, it’s just been drastically more expensive. What’s being argued here is that it’s not performant and while it might be more expensive initially, it’s less expensive to run and maintain.

      • @thedeadwalking4242
        link
        English
        612 hours ago

        Hard drives have longer shelf life than unpowered SSD. HDD are a good middle ground between SSD speeds, tape drive stability, and price they won’t go anywhere. The data world exists in tiers

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 hours ago

          The flaw with hard drives comes with large pools. The recovery speed is simply too slow when a drive fails, unless you build huge pools. So you need additional drives for more parity.

          I don’t know who cares about shelf life. Drives spin all their lives, which is 5-10 years. Use M-Disk or something if you want shelf life.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        016 hours ago

        Right up until an EMP wipes out all our data. I still maintain that we should be storing all our data on vinyl, doing it physically is the only guarantee.

        • @patatahooligan
          link
          English
          715 hours ago

          Microsoft has project Silica where they store data in glass. Being electromagnetic field-proof is one of the stated goals.

          • @AnUnusualRelic
            link
            English
            414 hours ago

            That’s a WORM medium though, so really purely for storage. Which is still extremely useful of course.