We really should have two major parties committed to upholding the Constitution. But at the moment we seem to have none. Because not only have the Republicans been captured by the corrupt fascism o…
We’re going to nominate someone who does things you find abhorrent. We will put all our resources into making certain that no one who prioritizes what you prioritize makes it through the primaries, and not really give much of a shit about the general. We will shout abuse at you for all criticism, demand but never think of earning your vote, and blame you every time we lose, regardless of how you vote.
We will fervently and lovingly kiss the asses of the worst republicans of the previous decades just to gloat about how far to the right we’ve taken the party.
When has any leading Democrat “shouted abuse” at the voting public?
You seem to taking the unpopularity of your politics very personally and blaming the Democratic Party as an institution - as opposed to the majority of Americans, who just don’t agree with you.
I take it by your ignoring my first question you don’t have an actual answer.
Your shitty wing would have lost by more. People thought Kamala was too far left. The only people insisting she was too far right wouldn’t have turned out to vote regardless. It’s your own fault. Your side is politically irrelevant.
People thought Kamala was too far left. The only people insisting she was too far right wouldn’t have turned out to vote regardless.
She tried to court them and only them anyway.
EDIT: misread as “not far enough to the right.” If people who thought she was too far to the right were so insignificant that they could be safely ignored, they’re too insignificant to blame for the loss she earned by moving to the right to please your shitty wing of the party.
Your obvious implication is that if Kamala put on a keffiyeh, people would have turned out en mass to vote for her. The implication being your side sitting this one out gave Trump the election.
And, considering he did win, it would appear that genocide is a winning strategy.
Your obvious implication is that if Kamala put on a keffiyeh, people would have turned out en mass to vote for her.
You’re continuing to be ridiculous. All she had to do was put one lousy photon of daylight between her and biden on the subject. That was too big an ask.
The implication being your side sitting this one out gave Trump the election.
We tried to warn you that it would happen. We could read the writing on the wall. Your wing chose to ignore it because you just loved genocide that much.
And, considering he did win, it would appear that genocide is a winning strategy.
If you’re trying to appeal to people who love genocide, it is. That’s republicans. They were never going to vote for harris. That’s the problem with moving to the right. republicans don’t believe you but democrats do,
We’re going to nominate someone who does things you find abhorrent. We will put all our resources into making certain that no one who prioritizes what you prioritize makes it through the primaries, and not really give much of a shit about the general. We will shout abuse at you for all criticism, demand but never think of earning your vote, and blame you every time we lose, regardless of how you vote.
We will fervently and lovingly kiss the asses of the worst republicans of the previous decades just to gloat about how far to the right we’ve taken the party.
When has any leading Democrat “shouted abuse” at the voting public?
You seem to taking the unpopularity of your politics very personally and blaming the Democratic Party as an institution - as opposed to the majority of Americans, who just don’t agree with you.
Your shitty wing of the party lost to trump twice because it wouldn’t listen to the people.
I take it by your ignoring my first question you don’t have an actual answer.
Your shitty wing would have lost by more. People thought Kamala was too far left. The only people insisting she was too far right wouldn’t have turned out to vote regardless. It’s your own fault. Your side is politically irrelevant.
My wing doesn’t support genocide.
She tried to court them and only them anyway.
EDIT: misread as “not far enough to the right.” If people who thought she was too far to the right were so insignificant that they could be safely ignored, they’re too insignificant to blame for the loss she earned by moving to the right to please your shitty wing of the party.
According to you, your wing got Trump elected, so it does.
Was healthcare, civil rights, education and equitable taxation not enough of a carrot?
Now where did I say that? Your wing is the one that thought genocide was the most winningest issue ever.
Your obvious implication is that if Kamala put on a keffiyeh, people would have turned out en mass to vote for her. The implication being your side sitting this one out gave Trump the election.
And, considering he did win, it would appear that genocide is a winning strategy.
You’re continuing to be ridiculous. All she had to do was put one lousy photon of daylight between her and biden on the subject. That was too big an ask.
We tried to warn you that it would happen. We could read the writing on the wall. Your wing chose to ignore it because you just loved genocide that much.
If you’re trying to appeal to people who love genocide, it is. That’s republicans. They were never going to vote for harris. That’s the problem with moving to the right. republicans don’t believe you but democrats do,