• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5823 hours ago

    He may not notice the financial loss but at the amount of money he’s trying to amass money isn’t the point. Power and control are the point. If his companies go under he’ll loose a lot of power and influence and I’m not sure his ego could handle that. He seems to crave attention of any kind. I’d be happy if he were reduced to a regular very rich guy with nothing of consequence to say anymore.

    • @Lightsong
      link
      1020 hours ago

      lose*

      loose is opposite of ‘tight’

      • @Vandals_handle
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Since Elons not wrapped too tight, I would have let it slide.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      317 hours ago

      If his companies go under he’ll loose a lot of power and influence and I’m not sure his ego could handle that.

      He’s currently an advisor the the United States President and has been given full authority to do “whatever he wants” to all executive branch offices.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 hours ago

          Musk is no Pence - he has his own cult separate from Trump and he’s just as good at playing the victim as trump.

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      What is his most profitable asset? Tesla stock? Spacex stock? So long as his total assets are worth $4 billion or more, there’s no change. Anything below that and he’ll lose influence due to financial strain. I’m looking forward to it!

      • chingadera
        link
        721 hours ago

        Why 4B? Why not 50M? That’s way enough for an overtly comfortable lifestyle

        • [email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          820 hours ago

          Any less and he couldn’t sustainably sway the entirety of the US’s governing structure by dividends alone, with redundancy.

          • chingadera
            link
            317 hours ago

            Is there some finance math behind that or something? Sounds like it’s a pretty concrete figure when you say it like that, but I’m not financially literate enough to understand

            • [email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              417 hours ago

              300M to buy a presidency once every four years, leaving him 3.7B to recoup his costs at 8%/year to stay ahead of inflation. If that wouldn’t work out, swap to purchasing the ears of 20% of all US senators.

              Though I didn’t realize that senate races average 90M now, so my figures were out of date. I was just winging it with mental math, nothing authoritative.

              • chingadera
                link
                317 hours ago

                Fair enough, but even if those figures were on the low end, that’s devastatingly low for what’s at stake

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                216 hours ago

                What part of Musks personality indicates he is this prudent? My guess is he would gamble it on the next idea but the market will turn in him because losing people billions (the only way he ends up with only 4 billion) is unforgivable.

                Trump only lost millions and had to turn to the mob. If Musk worked with the mob he’d be at the bottom of a river in a week .