• sunzu2
    13•1 day ago

    What’s the liability? Tiktok and faceberg permits teenagers to use their websites and nothing ever happened to them.

      • sunzu2
        9•1 day ago

        to recommend content like videos and posts could “exploit the weaknesses and inexperience” of children and stimulate “addictive behaviour.” It’

        Are you suggesting that Lemmy instances are engaged in behaviour like this?

        Do you have evidence?

        • @vxx
          -8•1 day ago

          There’s porn and violence and other adult content on Lemmy instances.

          You gotta follow the law of your target countries or youll end up in the dark net.

          The links were to disprove your claim nobody is holding them accountable.

          • sunzu2
            6•1 day ago

            There’s porn and violence and other adult content on Lemmy instances.

            So nothing then…

            You gotta follow the law of your target countries or youll end up in the dark net.

            Everyone follows the law… How is permitting a teenager to use a public message board violates the law?

                • @vxx
                  -4•1 day ago

                  Im not your personal translator.

                  • sunzu2
                    3•1 day ago

                    You provided German text to support your argument during a discussion conducted in English

                    I am trying to determine if there is any validity to your argument but it appears that you are also talking out of your ass with the “law” talking point.

                    I have done this exercise several times here on this topic and your side has yet to provide anything to support the position beyond broad appeal to authority. Which is at best a bootlicker argument.

          • Eugene V. Debs' GhostEnglish
            -2•18 hours ago

            There’s porn and violence and other adult content on Lemmy instances.

            Like there is in movies, TV, art, history, and other websites.