• @danc4498
    link
    English
    714 hours ago

    They both shoot rockets up in the sky. Our government could pay NASA to do it, or pay Space X.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      713 hours ago

      NASA does not build it’s own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.

      Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example

      • @danc4498
        link
        English
        113 hours ago

        Can Space X make the payloads?

        • @Cocodapuf
          link
          English
          37 hours ago

          Uh, basically no.

          NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn’t really make a lot of sense.

          • @danc4498
            link
            English
            17 hours ago

            So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.

            • @Cocodapuf
              link
              English
              36 hours ago

              I mean, that’s always been the case. That’s literally spaceX’s primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It’s the same for every launch provider in the US.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 hours ago

          SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.

          NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn’t want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay