• @danc4498
      link
      English
      818 hours ago

      They both shoot rockets up in the sky. Our government could pay NASA to do it, or pay Space X.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        618 hours ago

        NASA does not build it’s own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.

        Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example

        • @danc4498
          link
          English
          117 hours ago

          Can Space X make the payloads?

          • @Cocodapuf
            link
            English
            312 hours ago

            Uh, basically no.

            NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn’t really make a lot of sense.

            • @danc4498
              link
              English
              112 hours ago

              So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.

              • @Cocodapuf
                link
                English
                310 hours ago

                I mean, that’s always been the case. That’s literally spaceX’s primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It’s the same for every launch provider in the US.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            415 hours ago

            SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.

            NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn’t want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay