• @aleq
    link
    English
    146 hours ago

    Did they really? I assume they would do more research than me when choosing tech, but my initial reaction is “the fuck is a Jami?”. Is this a big app in recent years?

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      10
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      It’s a messenger backed by the GNU foundation. The last time I tried it it didn’t reliably deliver messages on Android.

    • @postall
      link
      English
      -75 hours ago

      And you’re proud of that? Well, I’m glad someone else has found out about serverless, independent messenger.

      • @aleq
        link
        English
        33 hours ago

        Not sure how you read pride into this at all, the implication is that if they don’t know about it it’s not a choice, while at the same time acknowledging that perhaps I’m just out of the loop.

      • mohab
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85 hours ago

        Jami sucks. I will continue to have it installed and hope one day it evolves into a reliable instant messenger, but, currently, it’s extremely unreliable. Not for times of war.

        • @postall
          link
          English
          -14 hours ago

          Yup, he had some problems that are almost gone now. It’s an obvious consequence of being completely serverless. But it provides independence. I transferred all my communication there, and frankly I’m surprised that everything works for many people I know. Signal doesn’t. But Telegram and WhatsApp still does. For how long…