• Optional
    link
    English
    160
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    First off, Signal hasn’t said anything, this is an accusation made at a conference in Kyiv. So - who knows, they’re behind, they don’t have billions to support an army, who knows.

    IF they have chosen to not help Ukraine where at all possible, that would be bad.

    All of that said, if I was running a modern army using an encrypted chat app, I’d fucking have all that shit in-house, wtf. It’s 2025. Ukraine already has a bunch of l337 h4X0rs. I’m sure they could slap something together in days and have it in the field in weeks.

      • mohab
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 hours ago

        I wish. SimpleX has a notification/delivery issue on iOS—it’s not reliable at all over there.

        • NebLem
          link
          English
          118 minutes ago

          Most Ukrainians are probably priced out from Apple products. I don’t think iOS is a concern in their use case.

    • @pntha
      link
      English
      5914 hours ago

      not to mention the Signal protocol is open source so they could literally build something in days and ensure the same encryption

      • @ForgotAboutDre
        link
        English
        126 hours ago

        Maintaining and testing such an app has costs and risks. They may think it’s more secure that signal does this. It is also harder to attack all of signal.

        They are also significantly resource constrained, everything they have goes towards defence. The effort building the app could be deployed on developing weapon systems they can’t buy.

        Your right nations should have their own independent systems for secure communications for military, politicians and civil service.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4416 hours ago

    What exactly is the cooperation that Signal was doing beforehand? Signal claims to collect very little data so I’m not sure how exactly they help?

    • socsa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2916 hours ago

      Russia was caught running a bunch of side channel and phishing attacks using malicious QR codes. Presumably signal could help track these patterns in terms of time and place, to help isolate where espionage activity was occuring.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3314 hours ago

        Except Signal should not have that data. They claim they do not log that information, so it should be impossible for them to do that.

        Unless signal is lying, that’s not something they can do.

          • @BigDiction
            link
            English
            48 hours ago

            This tracks. Signal claims to have your phone number and logs on the last time that number accessed the service.

            They could not generate new access codes via Twilio when certain patterns are detected and still be within that known data.

  • @rottingleaf
    link
    English
    4217 hours ago

    Did it ever respond to those “requests”? What would Signal have anyway other than phone number to login association.

    • @Brkdncr
      link
      English
      -1417 hours ago

      Call logs?

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          -1517 hours ago

          National security laws supercede the courts… If they called info on national security grounds, it would not be disclosed in court papers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1916 hours ago

            If they secretly kept that info and didn’t release it, I guess that could be true. But do we have a reason to believe they’re keeping that info?

            • sunzu2
              link
              fedilink
              516 hours ago

              a FISA court order can force them to collect what they can which would includr time stamps and who you are contacting.

              I don’t think signal logs it by default though, but jack shit they can do about national security laws since they are incorporated under US law.

        • @rottingleaf
          link
          English
          -517 hours ago

          Technically they can also store what I said, but yes, in fact it appears they don’t.

          • @rottingleaf
            link
            English
            59 hours ago

            So apparently some people think Signal can’t see to which number they send that registration confirmation SMS.

            Humanity isn’t worth it, these apes are doomed.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -2610 hours ago

    bye bye signal just deleted it.

    don’t need to support a pro kremlin app

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Hope you don’t use (almost) any other messaging app either. If a single unsubstantiated article is enough to make you stop using something, you should be using almost nothing anywhere.

    • @pulsewidth
      link
      English
      77 hours ago

      There’s a whole ocean between ‘a single (biased) source claims Signal have stopped responding to requests for cybercrime assistance’ and ‘Signal is a pro-Kremlin app’.

  • John Richard
    link
    English
    -5017 hours ago

    Give it time. Before long you’ll see articles about how we need to ban encryption to help Ukraine fight Russia & Democrats will support it cause that is how clueless many of them are.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            314 hours ago

            While I personally think a removal of encryption tends be on the other side of this conflict, I have been called a nonce several times by otherwise leftist folks because of my support for strong encryption(ie the only people who want encryption have something to hide ergo you’re a nonce). This is all anecdote so YMMV.

  • @postall
    link
    English
    -2917 hours ago

    Ok, they had choice to use Jami, app independent of anyone, but they chose centralization…

    • @cm0002
      link
      English
      2817 hours ago

      The article is about Signal providing info on what the Russians are doing on the app and not Ukraine using it themselves

    • @aleq
      link
      English
      1917 hours ago

      Did they really? I assume they would do more research than me when choosing tech, but my initial reaction is “the fuck is a Jami?”. Is this a big app in recent years?

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        It’s a messenger backed by the GNU foundation. The last time I tried it it didn’t reliably deliver messages on Android.

      • @postall
        link
        English
        -1417 hours ago

        And you’re proud of that? Well, I’m glad someone else has found out about serverless, independent messenger.

        • @aleq
          link
          English
          614 hours ago

          Not sure how you read pride into this at all, the implication is that if they don’t know about it it’s not a choice, while at the same time acknowledging that perhaps I’m just out of the loop.

        • mohab
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1216 hours ago

          Jami sucks. I will continue to have it installed and hope one day it evolves into a reliable instant messenger, but, currently, it’s extremely unreliable. Not for times of war.

          • @postall
            link
            English
            -515 hours ago

            Yup, he had some problems that are almost gone now. It’s an obvious consequence of being completely serverless. But it provides independence. I transferred all my communication there, and frankly I’m surprised that everything works for many people I know. Signal doesn’t. But Telegram and WhatsApp still does. For how long…

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        -1817 hours ago

        Damn… Hmm are they part of the US government?

        • Dr. Wesker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          20
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          The article explains everything. The gist is Russians are targeting Ukrainians with phishing attacks via Signal. There also is the suggestion they’re exploiting the linked devices functionality, though I’m not sure how.

          • sunzu2
            link
            fedilink
            -2917 hours ago

            Appreciate this, I don’t click links lol

            Apparently if they can get you to scan some bogus qr code they can get you add their device to your account.

            Why signal not cooperating tho? Following us government?

            • qaz
              link
              English
              1816 hours ago

              …I don’t click links…

              I strongly suggest doing so if you want to understand what the article is about

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Because they can’t without backdooring the software? Just like they also refuse to co-operate with Swedish government and threatened to leave the market should Sweden try to force them.

              You know Russian spies can also use TOR onion routing and so on.

              As for phishing there is nothing Signal can do about someone scanning a signal contact sharing QR and adding it to their contracts list beyond informative “hey are you really sure, really really sure you want to add this contact”. If user trusts someone they shouldn’t, no amount of app policy protections help. Or maybe they manage to shish them to scan and approve “share account to another device”. Again nothing Signal can do about that.

              • @Serinus
                link
                English
                016 hours ago

                As long as there’s a clear confirmation dialog.

            • Dr. Wesker
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Not sure. Might be political tension. Might be that phishing attacks are typically user error, and Signal feels like at a certain point it’s not their responsibility. Hard to say beyond conjecture, and I didn’t see a clear reason given in the article.

            • TheFANUM
              link
              English
              117 hours ago

              That’s not how anything works