@YoBuckStopsHere to politics English • 1 year agoThe science is clear. So why can’t governments agree on vaping?www.politico.euexternal-linkmessage-square193arrow-up1213arrow-down124
arrow-up1189arrow-down1external-linkThe science is clear. So why can’t governments agree on vaping?www.politico.eu@YoBuckStopsHere to politics English • 1 year agomessage-square193
minus-square@ChexMaxlink2•1 year agosecond and third-hand smoke and vaping aerosols contain harmful, toxic and cancer-causing chemicals that can be breathed in.
minus-square@mindbleachlink2•1 year agoYou’re why enforced civility is a fucking nightmare to deal with. ‘This doesn’t affect you!’ It does. ‘Well make it don’t.’
minus-squarePenguinJuicelinkfedilink0•1 year agoThat doesn’t invalidate my point. Yes, if someone is vaping somewhere inappropriate, that’s not right. But if they are outside, that’s really fucked that you think you get to dictate what other people do outside. It’s their world too.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•1 year agoSo you want the freedom to attack people minding their own business?
second and third-hand smoke and vaping aerosols contain harmful, toxic and cancer-causing chemicals that can be breathed in.
Then don’t stand near them?
You’re why enforced civility is a fucking nightmare to deal with.
‘This doesn’t affect you!’ It does. ‘Well make it don’t.’
That doesn’t invalidate my point. Yes, if someone is vaping somewhere inappropriate, that’s not right. But if they are outside, that’s really fucked that you think you get to dictate what other people do outside. It’s their world too.
So you want the freedom to attack people minding their own business?