Techie to TechnologyEnglish • 11 months agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square89arrow-up1798arrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]technology[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1784arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie to TechnologyEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square89cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]technology[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoSometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?
minus-square@AnUnusualReliclinkEnglish1•11 months agoI believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoBut that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0
Sometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?
It would add to adds 🤣 @shalva97 @joe
I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0