• serenissi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    honestly I love bricks and hate concrete blocks.

    btw what’s the most (not necessarily among these two) sustainable building material, lemmings?

      • ikidd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Caves. We should all live in caves.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d bet wood is better since if you use it for construction and farm it you can theoretically use it as a carbon sink, and it’s renewable.

        What’s the delta on mining and shaping stone vs lumber is the question

        • Tangent5280
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well stone lasts forever barring someone turning big stones into little stones. So I think stone might still come out on top

      • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        While I’m a big fan of stone, I do have complicated feelings on the mining industry, so I’m not sure about how sustainable it is.

    • Iron Lynx
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Honestly, whatever makes the most sense with the materials in the local area. And then I don’t mean what you can get from the local hardware store, but literally, what the earth in the area provides. If you have lots of clay, then brick would be best. If you have lots of big stones, then stone construction it’ll be. If you’re deep in the woods, then a wooden building would serve you just right. Maybe a combination of materials and techniques if you have options in the area.

      Bonus points if you can build in a way that passively optimises for managing things like moisture and temperature.

      • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thisss! You don’t need to invent some crazy futuristic material when humans have been building sustainably for millenia. All you have to do is look into: 1. what material is avaible in the area? and 2. what enviromental factors do you need to take into account? If you’re building in a hot area, the house needs to be able to stay cool. If you’re building in a cold area, the house needs to be able to stay warm.

    • dxdydz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Cob and rammed earth are hard to beat if you’ve got the right environment for them

          • serenissi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            you definitely don’t want a subscription based building. oh wait

        • darcranium123
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          The mud bricks. They are BY FAR the cheapest to procure. No transportation fee because it’s right next to your house, and no materials fee because it’s free from the earth. It lasts decades with only minor patchwork repair needed. Anyone can do it and you can literally put up a house in a few days. It’s so good at insulation it hardly needs any AC or Heating. So your costs are absurdly low compared to any other building material. You can straight up put up a house for $10k