One Maryland officer told a local news station that they have searched for other manufacturers of drones and none live up to the quality of DJI.

Maryland police are using drones from a Chinese company that were banned in four states::One Maryland officer told a local news station that they have searched for other manufacturers of drones and none live up to the quality of DJI.

  • @MeagerFleasEnglish
    13•1 year ago

    California LEO and 107 pilot here. Just about every UAV program I know of has DJI products in their fleet. Our fleet is 100% DJI currently. The officer quoted is right, other companies can’t beat the price and quality of DJI drones.

    • themeatbridgeEnglish
      5•1 year ago

      Have you considered that they are cheap for a reason? There is no secret to building quality components, it just costs more. DJI is able to produce better quality for a lower price, and it ships with free proprietary firmware. Pay no attention to those encrypted packets scurrying off to who knows where.

      • @AnUnusualRelicEnglish
        3•1 year ago

        That doesn’t appear to be a thing.

        Their security seems to be a bit flaky though.

        • Dark ArcEnglish
          0•1 year ago

          Here’s the problem with these things… Even if it’s not a thing right now, are you 100% certain it won’t be a thing at some point in the future?

          Electronics can very easily contain code, or outright hardware that changes after a set time or when given a signal.

          It’s the equivalent of having an agent of a foreign dictator and hostile power working as part of your police force. You don’t know when it’s going to turn, maybe it’ll never move against you, but it’s loyalties are elsewhere.

      • @[email protected]English
        2•1 year ago

        There is no secret to building quality components, it just costs more

        Savings due to mass-production, low wages, etc can translate into money invested in better components. Experience in the industry can also lead to more efficient designs.

        That doesn’t make them a “good” company but it also doesn’t mean that cheap=spyware

      • @MeagerFleasEnglish
        1•1 year ago

        Ultimately I’m not in charge of purchasing the drones. We can make suggestions but the decision comes from admin. Generally speaking we purchase our drones through a grant, so money isn’t unlimited. A lot of the top drone manufacturers are Chinese owned. We are on track to purchase a BRINC drone, which is a US based manufacturer.

        I’m not a fan of DJI products needing a firmware update for the batteries, the controller, and the drone itself. In the end there hasn’t been any evidence of data being sent to China or that these updates are somehow malicious.

        Until Congress or the state bans DJI, LEAs are going to keep choosing the cheapest, most effective option.