• @mondo_brondo
      link
      English
      60
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, that’s not what’s happening. Both the headline and the article indicate that they’re NOT going to pass laws to limit free speech, despite the fact that some Muslim countries have demanded they put a stop to Quran burning protests.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Danish person here: A lot of this is very much “politician speech”. They would of course never admit that their proposals would limit free speech in any way. What the Danish government seems to be planning is a ban on burning the Quran (and other holy texts) outside of embassies, which obviously is a restrictions of free speech, albeit a minor one.

        The other narrative that Lars Løkke (Foreign Minister) is hitting at the moment is that the abolition of the blasphemy law in 2017 went too far, and rolling it back a bit is necessary to protect “Danish interests”.

        • @mondo_brondo
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying. Do you mind elaborating?

            • @mondo_brondo
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ooohh I understand now. Thanks for explaining.

              Sadly, you’re probably right. :( The fear/hate mongering is real.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                To be fair, the subset of the Muslim population who does want to kill people over Koran burnings is absolutely a danger and should be condemned. Luckily that is a very small part of the overall population of Muslims.

      • @RaoulDook
        link
        English
        -61 year ago

        Yep that’s good. Nobody should be losing rights or freedoms in the 21st century.

        In the USA, I vote against anyone who proposes to limit our freedoms. I don’t have a lot of options to vote for though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          You vote for someone who ensures your freedoms won’t get restricted? TO DOWNVOTE HELL WITH YOU, YOU FILTHY CAPITALIST PIG!

    • “Islam” is not demanding anything as it isnt a monolithic institution or group. Also fascists and their conservative enablers are long past the point of caring for facts or reason. Preemptively giving in to their potential rage is only helping them gain more power and it will not stop their rage.

      Also according to that logic countries like Germany would be limitinf free speech, because burning Torah in front of a synagogue or jewish institution would be considered a hate crime in the same way that showing the Nazi salute or Flag in public is. Hate speech must not and cannot be covered under free speech. Publicly and demonstratively burning symbols of minority groups is a clear threat and call to hate against them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It’s not hate. It’s critique. Religious maniacs are not a minority group. They’re insane cults who damage children both mentally and physically through ritualistic genital mutilation.