• HousePanther
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Good! Large fines create a meaningful deterrent for bad behavior.

    • @Moogosa
      link
      English
      271 year ago

      Sure deterred them from doing it again after the first time… oh wait.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Cox was banned from telemarketing in a 2013 settlement with the FTC, which accused him of sending “illegal robocalls offering credit card interest rate reduction programs, extended automobile warranties, and home security systems.” At the time, the FTC said that Cox was issued “a $1.1 million civil penalty that will be suspended due to his inability to pay.”

      In 2017, the FTC obtained a similar telemarketing ban on Jones. He was also fined $2.7 million, but, as with Cox, the fine was “suspended based on his inability to pay.”

      No fine is going to be paid this time either I imagine.

      • st3ph3n
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        I’m not normally a proponent of prison for debtors, but in the case of these motherfuckers I’d be happy if they threw away the key.

      • @dan1101
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        suspended based on his inability to pay

        If only he had some way to make money fast.

    • Parallax
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’ll help as long as the fine is some % of their net income. Sweden does this, speeding tickets are a % of your income instead of a fixed fine, so someone with $10MM will still feel the burn.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Depends on if they make so much money that 300M is just cost of doing business. There needs to be prison time for those involved.

      Also $300M is the public fine number. Usually the actual fine is less than what is made public.