• @[email protected]
    10•1 year ago

    This isn’t exactly a helpful response. The two movements are different in myriad ways, and I see no reason to believe that the failure or success, however that may be defined, of one would cause the other to have the same fate.

    • @[email protected]
      9•1 year ago

      Mostly because the roots of every discrimination are basically the same, and if you focus on only one aspect of it, you will not succeed no matter how much progress you think you’re making. For example, both racism and misogyny is based on the old entitlement, on the old white men’s unearned sense of superiority, and if you don’t target that, you will never have an egalitarian society, even if you make them pretend that they aren’t overtly misogynistic anymore. It’s like TERFs teaming up with white supremacists to harass trans people, only to be incredibly surprised that white supremacists hate women too.

      • fkn
        2•1 year ago

        It’s more than this. It isn’t that there is only a common source. In fact, black women specifically suffer because the source is not single sourced.

        To paraphrase, Black women suffer the problems of women, because they are women. They also suffer the problems blacks face because they are black. But they also face problems that only black women face. The source of problems they face as blacks and women individually may well be white men… But they also suffer the inequalities imposed on them by black men, which are different than the inequalities placed on them by white men. And they suffer the what white women impose on them that is different than what is imposed on them by black men.

        The problem is that discrimination is multifaceted, and movements that only seek the liberation of one group often harbor the oppressors of another.

        A simple, explicit example. J.k. Rowling is a feminist. She is also a terf. She wants the advancement of the people she deems women while simultaneously seeking the exclusion of a group she hates.

        More bluntly, there are racists in the feminist movement who want to see black women suffer and those racists are not just white men.

      • @[email protected]
        2•1 year ago

        Kinda sounds like in that example, the reason for humans that are not white old men to be racist is those white old men. Sorry if I’m being ignorant here, but I always though racism is common among every demographic. I though it’s more of a thing that’s imprinted onto you and just not challenged because you don’t interact with enough people you have prejudices against. I don’t want to misrepresent your point, but from what I see, a racist black woman can exist without the white man to be the reason for that

        • @[email protected]
          8•1 year ago

          And if we were living in the black matriarchy, we would be having a different conversation. But we live in the white patriarchy, so we are having this one.
          But regardless, sexism, racism, homophobia, and every other types of descrimination have basically the same root, so there is no real way to get rid of one without getting rid of the rest.

          • @[email protected]
            2•1 year ago

            Sorry, I’m just not that informed on that subject, but what is the same root? The old white men? So if we locked all of them up we would be living in a utopia?

            • MemeCollectorOP
              4•1 year ago

              Lmfao, and I get called obtuse… How about do even the most superficial research in to racism and sexism and why they exist before you demand other people do the work for you, that you promptly disregard to continue pushing your own deliberate misunderstanding of the subject you clearly care so little about ? Sealions be sealioning, while those who can spot you miles away and refuse to feed your bullshit get called obtuse…

      • Milady
        10•1 year ago

        Do you just have nothing to say

        • MemeCollectorOP
          0•1 year ago

          Lmfao, I’m just waiting for you to explain to me how either feminism or anti-racism can succeed if the other fails.

          • @[email protected]
            1•1 year ago

            I don’t feel like I need to; the burden of proof is on you to explain why both must simultaneously succeed or fail

            • MemeCollectorOP
              1•1 year ago

              Lmfao, of course *you * think you shouldn’t have to. But you do! You asked why, to explain it to you, I need to understand what you’re struggling with.

              You refusing to say the quiet part out loud just confirms to me what I knew from that first comment - that you’re not genuinely interested, and that I have better things to waste my time on than on providing an education to someone who clearly doesn’t want it.

              • @[email protected]
                2•1 year ago

                If I make a meme which asserts that a giant Blahaj in the sky controls the American government, and you call it into question, is the burden of proof on you to explain what it is about the meme you don’t understand, or on me to show you why I believe it’s true?

                To put it in less sarcastic terms, the answer is that what I’m struggling with is the whole thing.

                • fkn
                  2•1 year ago

                  You have put very little to no effort into your why question, and it was very effective at making the op mad, so if your goal was trolling I suppose it was effective.

                  If you are serious, then you don’t have a good grasp of intersectionality and it isn’t ops responsibility to teach you… Particularly when you are aggressive about your lack of knowledge being a good place to argue from.

                  • @[email protected]
                    1•1 year ago

                    I am not trolling, but was hoping for somebody, OP or otherwise, to explain why they believe the message of the meme to be true, so that I or other lemmings could learn a bit more about the subject. I’m glad that the community has stepped in to share their knowledge. My intent was not to be aggressive with my comparison to Russell’s teapot Blahaj, if that’s what led you to your judgement of my attitude, but to show OP that the burden of proof was on them to show why the two movements are as interdependent as they claim.

            • MemeCollectorOP
              1•1 year ago

              Oh, you’re not even the same person lol

              If you want to know my feelings feel free to scroll through my magazine.

              Until then, get out of the way and let the person I was replying to explain to me why they see an issue with this post.

          • @TeckFireEnglish
            0•1 year ago

            I think we first need to define “failed….” The cat’s been out of the bag on both of these issues for a while now. Racism and misogyny will still be around, but the pushback from the past makes it kind of hard to believe that we’ll all just go back to the standards of the 1800’s or something…

            • MemeCollectorOPEnglish
              2•1 year ago

              So you’re claiming racism and sexism are what, an inevitable part of (white male) human nature we just have to put up with, while you get on with your oppressing? Yet if I said men are shit I guarantee you’d reply with “not all men”… Gtfoh you racist sexist ass.

              • @TeckFireEnglish
                1•1 year ago

                …what? That’s not at all the point I was trying to make

                I meant that ever since humanity started to grow more aware of the fact that racism and sexism can be so damaging, that that knowledge is kind of hard to forget or bury, and I don’t believe that either one of them will go back to the “dark ages” of the 1800’s. So with that in mind, especially with the internet available, what constitutes as racism or sexism reforms “failing?” Is it failure to achieve perfect extermination of these outdated ideals? Or is it something more extreme, like society undoing changes that have already been made towards rights and awareness?

                Full disclosure: I am a US citizen, so much of my knowledge on racist and sexist societal reforms are framed with this in mind, I can’t speak to other countries

                • fkn
                  3•1 year ago

                  https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/combahee-river-collective-statement-1977/

                  The tl;dr is that independent movements leave or create additional issues. The example I have used elsewhere in my replies on this post is jk Rowling. She is a feminist. She is also a terf. Feminism, by itself, doesn’t solve the problems of other excluded minority groups. If feminism was the only movement we considered, Rowlings position might not have ever been exposed and the bigotry that trans women face wouldn’t be addressed by the feminist movement because terfs would silently exclude them.

                  In the 30s and 40s a major problem with feminism was the racism that infected it. It was for women’s rights, as long as it was white women. This problem still exists today. Is feminism, feminism if black women are left behind? Are black women not women? Are trans women not women?

                  • @TeckFireEnglish
                    1•1 year ago

                    With the context of the other comments on this post, I have a much better understanding of what I think you’re trying to say, which is that (and correct me if I’m wrong) in order for these movements to succeed completely, they must work congruently with each other. Rather, it’s not about a movement “failing,” but about individual movements not maximizing potential for benefit without adjacent ideals. Does that sound about right?

                    In other words, feminism hasn’t “failed,” but it won’t “succeed” if TERFs are the primary figures, for example